Uncertainty Evaluation of the Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films Technique
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Environmental science & technology , Vol. 49.2015, No. 3, 03.02.2015, p. 1594-1602.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex - Download
}
RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download
TY - JOUR
T1 - Uncertainty Evaluation of the Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films Technique
AU - Kreuzeder, Andreas
AU - Santner, Jakob
AU - Zhang, Hao
AU - Prohaska, Thomas
AU - Wenzel, Walter W.
PY - 2015/2/3
Y1 - 2015/2/3
N2 - Although the analytical performance of the diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) technique is well investigated, there is no systematic analysis of the DGT measurement uncertainty and its sources. In this study we determine the uncertainties of bulk DGT measurements (not considering labile complexes) and of DGT-based chemical imaging using laser ablation - inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. We show that under well-controlled experimental conditions the relative combined uncertainties of bulk DGT measurements are ∼10% at a confidence interval of 95%. While several factors considerably contribute to the uncertainty of bulk DGT, the uncertainty of DGT LA-ICP-MS mainly depends on the signal variability of the ablation analysis. The combined uncertainties determined in this study support the use of DGT as a monitoring instrument. It is expected that the analytical requirements of legal frameworks, for example, the EU Drinking Water Directive, are met by DGT sampling.
AB - Although the analytical performance of the diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) technique is well investigated, there is no systematic analysis of the DGT measurement uncertainty and its sources. In this study we determine the uncertainties of bulk DGT measurements (not considering labile complexes) and of DGT-based chemical imaging using laser ablation - inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. We show that under well-controlled experimental conditions the relative combined uncertainties of bulk DGT measurements are ∼10% at a confidence interval of 95%. While several factors considerably contribute to the uncertainty of bulk DGT, the uncertainty of DGT LA-ICP-MS mainly depends on the signal variability of the ablation analysis. The combined uncertainties determined in this study support the use of DGT as a monitoring instrument. It is expected that the analytical requirements of legal frameworks, for example, the EU Drinking Water Directive, are met by DGT sampling.
U2 - 10.1021/es504533e
DO - 10.1021/es504533e
M3 - Article
VL - 49.2015
SP - 1594
EP - 1602
JO - Environmental science & technology
JF - Environmental science & technology
SN - 0013-936X
IS - 3
ER -