Uncertainty Evaluation of the Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films Technique

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Uncertainty Evaluation of the Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films Technique. / Kreuzeder, Andreas; Santner, Jakob; Zhang, Hao et al.
In: Environmental science & technology , Vol. 49.2015, No. 3, 03.02.2015, p. 1594-1602.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Vancouver

Kreuzeder A, Santner J, Zhang H, Prohaska T, Wenzel WW. Uncertainty Evaluation of the Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films Technique. Environmental science & technology . 2015 Feb 3;49.2015(3):1594-1602. Epub 2015 Jan 12. doi: 10.1021/es504533e

Author

Kreuzeder, Andreas ; Santner, Jakob ; Zhang, Hao et al. / Uncertainty Evaluation of the Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films Technique. In: Environmental science & technology . 2015 ; Vol. 49.2015, No. 3. pp. 1594-1602.

Bibtex - Download

@article{fa20f8baee6d499baffd12a6e357a5c0,
title = "Uncertainty Evaluation of the Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films Technique",
abstract = "Although the analytical performance of the diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) technique is well investigated, there is no systematic analysis of the DGT measurement uncertainty and its sources. In this study we determine the uncertainties of bulk DGT measurements (not considering labile complexes) and of DGT-based chemical imaging using laser ablation - inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. We show that under well-controlled experimental conditions the relative combined uncertainties of bulk DGT measurements are ∼10% at a confidence interval of 95%. While several factors considerably contribute to the uncertainty of bulk DGT, the uncertainty of DGT LA-ICP-MS mainly depends on the signal variability of the ablation analysis. The combined uncertainties determined in this study support the use of DGT as a monitoring instrument. It is expected that the analytical requirements of legal frameworks, for example, the EU Drinking Water Directive, are met by DGT sampling.",
author = "Andreas Kreuzeder and Jakob Santner and Hao Zhang and Thomas Prohaska and Wenzel, {Walter W.}",
year = "2015",
month = feb,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1021/es504533e",
language = "English",
volume = "49.2015",
pages = "1594--1602",
journal = "Environmental science & technology ",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "3",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uncertainty Evaluation of the Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films Technique

AU - Kreuzeder, Andreas

AU - Santner, Jakob

AU - Zhang, Hao

AU - Prohaska, Thomas

AU - Wenzel, Walter W.

PY - 2015/2/3

Y1 - 2015/2/3

N2 - Although the analytical performance of the diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) technique is well investigated, there is no systematic analysis of the DGT measurement uncertainty and its sources. In this study we determine the uncertainties of bulk DGT measurements (not considering labile complexes) and of DGT-based chemical imaging using laser ablation - inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. We show that under well-controlled experimental conditions the relative combined uncertainties of bulk DGT measurements are ∼10% at a confidence interval of 95%. While several factors considerably contribute to the uncertainty of bulk DGT, the uncertainty of DGT LA-ICP-MS mainly depends on the signal variability of the ablation analysis. The combined uncertainties determined in this study support the use of DGT as a monitoring instrument. It is expected that the analytical requirements of legal frameworks, for example, the EU Drinking Water Directive, are met by DGT sampling.

AB - Although the analytical performance of the diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) technique is well investigated, there is no systematic analysis of the DGT measurement uncertainty and its sources. In this study we determine the uncertainties of bulk DGT measurements (not considering labile complexes) and of DGT-based chemical imaging using laser ablation - inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. We show that under well-controlled experimental conditions the relative combined uncertainties of bulk DGT measurements are ∼10% at a confidence interval of 95%. While several factors considerably contribute to the uncertainty of bulk DGT, the uncertainty of DGT LA-ICP-MS mainly depends on the signal variability of the ablation analysis. The combined uncertainties determined in this study support the use of DGT as a monitoring instrument. It is expected that the analytical requirements of legal frameworks, for example, the EU Drinking Water Directive, are met by DGT sampling.

U2 - 10.1021/es504533e

DO - 10.1021/es504533e

M3 - Article

VL - 49.2015

SP - 1594

EP - 1602

JO - Environmental science & technology

JF - Environmental science & technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 3

ER -