Influence of platform preheating on in situ precipitation in an FeCoMo alloy during laser powder bed fusion
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Materials characterization, Vol. 197.2023, No. March, 112689, 03.2023.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex - Download
}
RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download
TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of platform preheating on in situ precipitation in an FeCoMo alloy during laser powder bed fusion
AU - Cui, Charlotte
AU - Leitner, Harald
AU - Platl, Jan
AU - Schnitzer, Ronald
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - The nanostructure of a laser powder bed fused (LPBF) FeCoMo maraging alloy was investigated with atom probe tomography (APT). Two as-built conditions were examined: without platform preheating and with a nominal platform preheating temperature T P=500°C. The results showed that the martensite start temperature of the FeCoMo alloy is lower than T P and the intermetallic strengthening μ-phase precipitates from the martensite phase and not from the austenite phase. By comparing the μ-phase precipitation stages in the specimens, a model for the temperature distribution during LPBF with T P=500°C was proposed. It was concluded that the platform surface did not attain the nominal preheating temperature and that the temperature in the built part decreased with increasing distance from the platform. Intrinsic heat treatment (IHT) during LPBF alone did not provide sufficient energy (temperature and/or time) for μ-phase precipitation.
AB - The nanostructure of a laser powder bed fused (LPBF) FeCoMo maraging alloy was investigated with atom probe tomography (APT). Two as-built conditions were examined: without platform preheating and with a nominal platform preheating temperature T P=500°C. The results showed that the martensite start temperature of the FeCoMo alloy is lower than T P and the intermetallic strengthening μ-phase precipitates from the martensite phase and not from the austenite phase. By comparing the μ-phase precipitation stages in the specimens, a model for the temperature distribution during LPBF with T P=500°C was proposed. It was concluded that the platform surface did not attain the nominal preheating temperature and that the temperature in the built part decreased with increasing distance from the platform. Intrinsic heat treatment (IHT) during LPBF alone did not provide sufficient energy (temperature and/or time) for μ-phase precipitation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146861120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.matchar.2023.112689
DO - 10.1016/j.matchar.2023.112689
M3 - Article
VL - 197.2023
JO - Materials characterization
JF - Materials characterization
SN - 1044-5803
IS - March
M1 - 112689
ER -