Influence of focus offset on the microstructure of an intermetallic γ-TiAl based alloy produced by electron beam powder bed fusion
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Journal of manufacturing processes, Vol. 89.2023, No. 3 March, 03.03.2023, p. 132-141.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex - Download
}
RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download
TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of focus offset on the microstructure of an intermetallic γ-TiAl based alloy produced by electron beam powder bed fusion
AU - Ghibaudo, Christian
AU - Wartbichler, Reinhold
AU - Marchese, G.
AU - Clemens, Helmut
AU - Ugues, Daniele
AU - Biamino, Sara
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023
PY - 2023/3/3
Y1 - 2023/3/3
N2 - It is well established in literature that, when processing intermetallic γ-TiAl components by electron beam powder bed fusion, a banded microstructure is frequently formed because of an inhomogeneous Al distribution since more pronounced evaporation of Al occurs at the top of the melt pool. This feature is particularly promoted when highly energetic process parameters (high beam currents, slow beam speeds, narrow line offsets) are used. Therefore, an approach already suggested in the literature to reduce the Al loss is to minimize the energy level of the process parameter during production. However, there is a limit to such kind of approach: minimizing the beam current or increasing the beam speed, or increasing the line offset will, at a certain point, results in not being able to achieve a completely dense material and thus some process-induced porosity, the so-called lack-of-fusion defects, starts to occur in the produced parts. In this study, the effect of an additional parameter of the electron beam powder bed fusion process is taken under consideration: the focus offset (FO), i.e. the distance between the focusing plane of the electron beam with respect to the powder bed. The effect of the FO on the residual porosity, microstructure, phase composition, hardness as well as chemical composition is investigated, thus having the possibility to demonstrate that also the FO can affect the Al loss and play a fundamental role in the generation of a homogenous microstructure, contributing to mitigate the appearance of a banded microstructure.
AB - It is well established in literature that, when processing intermetallic γ-TiAl components by electron beam powder bed fusion, a banded microstructure is frequently formed because of an inhomogeneous Al distribution since more pronounced evaporation of Al occurs at the top of the melt pool. This feature is particularly promoted when highly energetic process parameters (high beam currents, slow beam speeds, narrow line offsets) are used. Therefore, an approach already suggested in the literature to reduce the Al loss is to minimize the energy level of the process parameter during production. However, there is a limit to such kind of approach: minimizing the beam current or increasing the beam speed, or increasing the line offset will, at a certain point, results in not being able to achieve a completely dense material and thus some process-induced porosity, the so-called lack-of-fusion defects, starts to occur in the produced parts. In this study, the effect of an additional parameter of the electron beam powder bed fusion process is taken under consideration: the focus offset (FO), i.e. the distance between the focusing plane of the electron beam with respect to the powder bed. The effect of the FO on the residual porosity, microstructure, phase composition, hardness as well as chemical composition is investigated, thus having the possibility to demonstrate that also the FO can affect the Al loss and play a fundamental role in the generation of a homogenous microstructure, contributing to mitigate the appearance of a banded microstructure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147798259&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.01.061
DO - 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.01.061
M3 - Article
VL - 89.2023
SP - 132
EP - 141
JO - Journal of manufacturing processes
JF - Journal of manufacturing processes
SN - 0278-6125
IS - 3 March
ER -