Influence of Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty on Tibiofemoral Kinematics—A Cadaveric Investigation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Influence of Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty on Tibiofemoral Kinematics—A Cadaveric Investigation. / Maderbacher, Guenther; Keshmiri, Armin; Springorum, Hans Robert et al.
In: The Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 32.2017, No. 9, 01.09.2017, p. 2869-2877.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Vancouver

Maderbacher G, Keshmiri A, Springorum HR, Maderbacher H, Grifka J, Baier C. Influence of Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty on Tibiofemoral Kinematics—A Cadaveric Investigation. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2017 Sept 1;32.2017(9):2869-2877. Epub 2017 Apr 1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.055

Author

Maderbacher, Guenther ; Keshmiri, Armin ; Springorum, Hans Robert et al. / Influence of Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty on Tibiofemoral Kinematics—A Cadaveric Investigation. In: The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2017 ; Vol. 32.2017, No. 9. pp. 2869-2877.

Bibtex - Download

@article{006fd087381944138fd2abbe8a97f304,
title = "Influence of Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty on Tibiofemoral Kinematics—A Cadaveric Investigation",
abstract = "Background Physiological tibiofemoral kinematics have been shown to be important for good knee function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of component rotation on tibiofemoral kinematics during knee flexion. We asked which axial component alignment best reconstructs physiological tibiofemoral kinematics and which combinations should be avoided. Methods Ten healthy cadaveric knees were examined. By means of a navigational device, tibiofemoral kinematics between 0° and 90° of flexion were assessed before and after TKA using the following different rotational component alignment: femoral components: ligament balanced, 6° internal, 3° external rotation, and 6° external rotation in relation to the posterior condylar line; tibial components: self-adapted, 6° internal rotation, and 6° external rotation. Results Physiological tibiofemoral kinematics could be partly reconstructed by TKA. Ligament-balanced femoral rotation and 6° femoral external rotation both in combination with 6° tibial component external rotation, and 3° femoral external rotation in combination with 6° tibial component internal rotation or self-aligning tibial component were able to restore tibial longitudinal rotation. Largest kinematical differences were found for the combination femoral component internal and tibial component external rotations. Conclusion From a kinematic-based view, surgeons should avoid internal rotation of femoral components. However, even often recommended combinations of rotational component alignment (3° femoral external and tibial external rotation) significantly change tibiofemoral kinematics. Self-aligning tibial components solely restored tibiofemoral kinematics with the combination of 3° femoral component of external rotation. For the future, navigational devices might help to axially align components to restore patient-specific and natural tibiofemoral kinematics.",
keywords = "component alignment, kinematics, knee, roll back, rotational alignment, TKA",
author = "Guenther Maderbacher and Armin Keshmiri and Springorum, {Hans Robert} and Hermann Maderbacher and Joachim Grifka and Clemens Baier",
year = "2017",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.055",
language = "English",
volume = "32.2017",
pages = "2869--2877",
journal = "The Journal of Arthroplasty",
issn = "0883-5403",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "9",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty on Tibiofemoral Kinematics—A Cadaveric Investigation

AU - Maderbacher, Guenther

AU - Keshmiri, Armin

AU - Springorum, Hans Robert

AU - Maderbacher, Hermann

AU - Grifka, Joachim

AU - Baier, Clemens

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Background Physiological tibiofemoral kinematics have been shown to be important for good knee function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of component rotation on tibiofemoral kinematics during knee flexion. We asked which axial component alignment best reconstructs physiological tibiofemoral kinematics and which combinations should be avoided. Methods Ten healthy cadaveric knees were examined. By means of a navigational device, tibiofemoral kinematics between 0° and 90° of flexion were assessed before and after TKA using the following different rotational component alignment: femoral components: ligament balanced, 6° internal, 3° external rotation, and 6° external rotation in relation to the posterior condylar line; tibial components: self-adapted, 6° internal rotation, and 6° external rotation. Results Physiological tibiofemoral kinematics could be partly reconstructed by TKA. Ligament-balanced femoral rotation and 6° femoral external rotation both in combination with 6° tibial component external rotation, and 3° femoral external rotation in combination with 6° tibial component internal rotation or self-aligning tibial component were able to restore tibial longitudinal rotation. Largest kinematical differences were found for the combination femoral component internal and tibial component external rotations. Conclusion From a kinematic-based view, surgeons should avoid internal rotation of femoral components. However, even often recommended combinations of rotational component alignment (3° femoral external and tibial external rotation) significantly change tibiofemoral kinematics. Self-aligning tibial components solely restored tibiofemoral kinematics with the combination of 3° femoral component of external rotation. For the future, navigational devices might help to axially align components to restore patient-specific and natural tibiofemoral kinematics.

AB - Background Physiological tibiofemoral kinematics have been shown to be important for good knee function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of component rotation on tibiofemoral kinematics during knee flexion. We asked which axial component alignment best reconstructs physiological tibiofemoral kinematics and which combinations should be avoided. Methods Ten healthy cadaveric knees were examined. By means of a navigational device, tibiofemoral kinematics between 0° and 90° of flexion were assessed before and after TKA using the following different rotational component alignment: femoral components: ligament balanced, 6° internal, 3° external rotation, and 6° external rotation in relation to the posterior condylar line; tibial components: self-adapted, 6° internal rotation, and 6° external rotation. Results Physiological tibiofemoral kinematics could be partly reconstructed by TKA. Ligament-balanced femoral rotation and 6° femoral external rotation both in combination with 6° tibial component external rotation, and 3° femoral external rotation in combination with 6° tibial component internal rotation or self-aligning tibial component were able to restore tibial longitudinal rotation. Largest kinematical differences were found for the combination femoral component internal and tibial component external rotations. Conclusion From a kinematic-based view, surgeons should avoid internal rotation of femoral components. However, even often recommended combinations of rotational component alignment (3° femoral external and tibial external rotation) significantly change tibiofemoral kinematics. Self-aligning tibial components solely restored tibiofemoral kinematics with the combination of 3° femoral component of external rotation. For the future, navigational devices might help to axially align components to restore patient-specific and natural tibiofemoral kinematics.

KW - component alignment

KW - kinematics

KW - knee

KW - roll back

KW - rotational alignment

KW - TKA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018638350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.055

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.055

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85018638350

VL - 32.2017

SP - 2869

EP - 2877

JO - The Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - The Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

IS - 9

ER -