Impact of Surface Microstructure and Properties of Aluminum Electrodes on the Plating/Stripping Behavior of Aluminum-Based Batteries Using Imidazolium-Based Electrolyte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Impact of Surface Microstructure and Properties of Aluminum Electrodes on the Plating/Stripping Behavior of Aluminum-Based Batteries Using Imidazolium-Based Electrolyte. / Razaz, Ghadir; Weißensteiner, Irmgard; Örtegren, Jonas et al.
In: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Vol. 16.2024, No. 47, 16.11.2024, p. 64389-65740.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Bibtex - Download

@article{75faa20caf1846c28235758dc8eabec9,
title = "Impact of Surface Microstructure and Properties of Aluminum Electrodes on the Plating/Stripping Behavior of Aluminum-Based Batteries Using Imidazolium-Based Electrolyte",
abstract = "The 99.99% Al used for negative Al electrodes in aluminum-based battery studies is expensive. This is primarily due to the complex challenges associated with fabricating 99.99% Al, particularly the removal of Fe impurities from Al melts. Despite the importance of this issue for the future commercialization of Al-based batteries, it has been largely overlooked. This work accordingly studied the plating/stripping behavior of Al containing 1 wt % iron (Al 1% Fe) as an alternative electrode using conventional ([EMIm]Cl and AlCl3) electrolyte. Simultaneously, the impact of the surface microstructure of Al 1% Fe on the plating/stripping behavior was examined. The results indicate that the difference in the plating/stripping cycling of Al 1% Fe alloys and 99.99% Al is negligible. Thus, Al 1% Fe negative electrodes could serve as an efficient and commercially viable alternative to 99.99% Al for plating/stripping in Al-based batteries. This is an essential finding because facile and commercial fabrication of Al 1% Fe electrodes is absolutely feasible. The results are further discussed in terms of the impact of the Al surface microstructure (i.e., grain size, defect density, grain boundary distribution, crystal orientation, and intermetallic phases) on plating/stripping behavior. Moreover, this study provides insights into how the interphase layer formed on Al electrodes influences plating/stripping behavior.",
author = "Ghadir Razaz and Irmgard Wei{\ss}ensteiner and Jonas {\"O}rtegren and Bernhard Trink and Stefan Pogatscher and {Arshadi Rastabi}, Shahrzad",
note = "doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c18168",
year = "2024",
month = nov,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1021/acsami.4c18168",
language = "English",
volume = "16.2024",
pages = "64389--65740",
journal = "ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces",
issn = "1944-8244",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "47",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of Surface Microstructure and Properties of Aluminum Electrodes on the Plating/Stripping Behavior of Aluminum-Based Batteries Using Imidazolium-Based Electrolyte

AU - Razaz, Ghadir

AU - Weißensteiner, Irmgard

AU - Örtegren, Jonas

AU - Trink, Bernhard

AU - Pogatscher, Stefan

AU - Arshadi Rastabi, Shahrzad

N1 - doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c18168

PY - 2024/11/16

Y1 - 2024/11/16

N2 - The 99.99% Al used for negative Al electrodes in aluminum-based battery studies is expensive. This is primarily due to the complex challenges associated with fabricating 99.99% Al, particularly the removal of Fe impurities from Al melts. Despite the importance of this issue for the future commercialization of Al-based batteries, it has been largely overlooked. This work accordingly studied the plating/stripping behavior of Al containing 1 wt % iron (Al 1% Fe) as an alternative electrode using conventional ([EMIm]Cl and AlCl3) electrolyte. Simultaneously, the impact of the surface microstructure of Al 1% Fe on the plating/stripping behavior was examined. The results indicate that the difference in the plating/stripping cycling of Al 1% Fe alloys and 99.99% Al is negligible. Thus, Al 1% Fe negative electrodes could serve as an efficient and commercially viable alternative to 99.99% Al for plating/stripping in Al-based batteries. This is an essential finding because facile and commercial fabrication of Al 1% Fe electrodes is absolutely feasible. The results are further discussed in terms of the impact of the Al surface microstructure (i.e., grain size, defect density, grain boundary distribution, crystal orientation, and intermetallic phases) on plating/stripping behavior. Moreover, this study provides insights into how the interphase layer formed on Al electrodes influences plating/stripping behavior.

AB - The 99.99% Al used for negative Al electrodes in aluminum-based battery studies is expensive. This is primarily due to the complex challenges associated with fabricating 99.99% Al, particularly the removal of Fe impurities from Al melts. Despite the importance of this issue for the future commercialization of Al-based batteries, it has been largely overlooked. This work accordingly studied the plating/stripping behavior of Al containing 1 wt % iron (Al 1% Fe) as an alternative electrode using conventional ([EMIm]Cl and AlCl3) electrolyte. Simultaneously, the impact of the surface microstructure of Al 1% Fe on the plating/stripping behavior was examined. The results indicate that the difference in the plating/stripping cycling of Al 1% Fe alloys and 99.99% Al is negligible. Thus, Al 1% Fe negative electrodes could serve as an efficient and commercially viable alternative to 99.99% Al for plating/stripping in Al-based batteries. This is an essential finding because facile and commercial fabrication of Al 1% Fe electrodes is absolutely feasible. The results are further discussed in terms of the impact of the Al surface microstructure (i.e., grain size, defect density, grain boundary distribution, crystal orientation, and intermetallic phases) on plating/stripping behavior. Moreover, this study provides insights into how the interphase layer formed on Al electrodes influences plating/stripping behavior.

U2 - 10.1021/acsami.4c18168

DO - 10.1021/acsami.4c18168

M3 - Article

VL - 16.2024

SP - 64389

EP - 65740

JO - ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

JF - ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

SN - 1944-8244

IS - 47

ER -