Hardness, strength and abrasivity of rocks: Correlations and predictions
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Geomechanics and tunnelling = Geomechanik und Tunnelbau, Vol. 16.2023, No. 2, 14.04.2023, p. 184-192.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex - Download
}
RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hardness, strength and abrasivity of rocks: Correlations and predictions
AU - Kaspar, Markus
AU - Latal, Christine
AU - Pittino, Gerhard
AU - Blümel, Manfred
PY - 2023/4/14
Y1 - 2023/4/14
N2 - Since ancient times, rocks and their geomechanical and mineralogical properties have played a fundamental role for realising construction and infrastructure projects. Workability and excavability of the material itself are still decisive factors controlling tool wear and advancement rates. In engineering geology, standardised tests and analyses related to the strength, hardness, abrasivity and mineralogical composition are commonly conducted in this context. The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), CERCHAR Abrasivity Index (CAI) and equivalent quartz content are widely used parameters for such an assessment, in order to estimate and predict drillability and associated wear of drill bits, cutting discs or chisels. In this article, the correlations between strength, abrasivity and mineral content of various rock types are investigated. The concept of hardness in geotechnics and engineering geology is elaborated in greater detail, shedding light on hardness definitions, testing methods and how hardness parameters are interrelated. Under the aspect that the CAI shows a good correlation with the Mohs hardness commonly used in mineralogy, a novel approach for estimating the CAI is presented. It is suggested that the CAI of a rock can be estimated within 50 % of the actual value, if its UCS exceeds »60 MPa. On the data basis of various rock types analysed from national and international construction projects, the potential and limitations of this method are discussed.
AB - Since ancient times, rocks and their geomechanical and mineralogical properties have played a fundamental role for realising construction and infrastructure projects. Workability and excavability of the material itself are still decisive factors controlling tool wear and advancement rates. In engineering geology, standardised tests and analyses related to the strength, hardness, abrasivity and mineralogical composition are commonly conducted in this context. The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), CERCHAR Abrasivity Index (CAI) and equivalent quartz content are widely used parameters for such an assessment, in order to estimate and predict drillability and associated wear of drill bits, cutting discs or chisels. In this article, the correlations between strength, abrasivity and mineral content of various rock types are investigated. The concept of hardness in geotechnics and engineering geology is elaborated in greater detail, shedding light on hardness definitions, testing methods and how hardness parameters are interrelated. Under the aspect that the CAI shows a good correlation with the Mohs hardness commonly used in mineralogy, a novel approach for estimating the CAI is presented. It is suggested that the CAI of a rock can be estimated within 50 % of the actual value, if its UCS exceeds »60 MPa. On the data basis of various rock types analysed from national and international construction projects, the potential and limitations of this method are discussed.
KW - rock strength
KW - rock hardness
KW - rock mechanics
KW - engineering geology
KW - Felsmechanik
KW - Ingenieurgeologie
U2 - 10.1002/geot.202200007
DO - 10.1002/geot.202200007
M3 - Article
VL - 16.2023
SP - 184
EP - 192
JO - Geomechanics and tunnelling = Geomechanik und Tunnelbau
JF - Geomechanics and tunnelling = Geomechanik und Tunnelbau
SN - 1865-7362
IS - 2
ER -