Hardness, strength and abrasivity of rocks: Correlations and predictions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Hardness, strength and abrasivity of rocks: Correlations and predictions. / Kaspar, Markus; Latal, Christine; Pittino, Gerhard et al.
In: Geomechanics and tunnelling = Geomechanik und Tunnelbau, Vol. 16.2023, No. 2, 14.04.2023, p. 184-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Vancouver

Kaspar M, Latal C, Pittino G, Blümel M. Hardness, strength and abrasivity of rocks: Correlations and predictions. Geomechanics and tunnelling = Geomechanik und Tunnelbau. 2023 Apr 14;16.2023(2):184-192. doi: 10.1002/geot.202200007

Author

Bibtex - Download

@article{e86228d78f404fa5a9ec9a48d884af0a,
title = "Hardness, strength and abrasivity of rocks: Correlations and predictions",
abstract = "Since ancient times, rocks and their geomechanical and mineralogical properties have played a fundamental role for realising construction and infrastructure projects. Workability and excavability of the material itself are still decisive factors controlling tool wear and advancement rates. In engineering geology, standardised tests and analyses related to the strength, hardness, abrasivity and mineralogical composition are commonly conducted in this context. The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), CERCHAR Abrasivity Index (CAI) and equivalent quartz content are widely used parameters for such an assessment, in order to estimate and predict drillability and associated wear of drill bits, cutting discs or chisels. In this article, the correlations between strength, abrasivity and mineral content of various rock types are investigated. The concept of hardness in geotechnics and engineering geology is elaborated in greater detail, shedding light on hardness definitions, testing methods and how hardness parameters are interrelated. Under the aspect that the CAI shows a good correlation with the Mohs hardness commonly used in mineralogy, a novel approach for estimating the CAI is presented. It is suggested that the CAI of a rock can be estimated within 50 % of the actual value, if its UCS exceeds »60 MPa. On the data basis of various rock types analysed from national and international construction projects, the potential and limitations of this method are discussed.",
keywords = "rock strength, rock hardness, rock mechanics, engineering geology, Felsmechanik, Ingenieurgeologie",
author = "Markus Kaspar and Christine Latal and Gerhard Pittino and Manfred Bl{\"u}mel",
year = "2023",
month = apr,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1002/geot.202200007",
language = "English",
volume = "16.2023",
pages = "184--192",
journal = "Geomechanics and tunnelling = Geomechanik und Tunnelbau",
issn = "1865-7362",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH ",
number = "2",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hardness, strength and abrasivity of rocks: Correlations and predictions

AU - Kaspar, Markus

AU - Latal, Christine

AU - Pittino, Gerhard

AU - Blümel, Manfred

PY - 2023/4/14

Y1 - 2023/4/14

N2 - Since ancient times, rocks and their geomechanical and mineralogical properties have played a fundamental role for realising construction and infrastructure projects. Workability and excavability of the material itself are still decisive factors controlling tool wear and advancement rates. In engineering geology, standardised tests and analyses related to the strength, hardness, abrasivity and mineralogical composition are commonly conducted in this context. The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), CERCHAR Abrasivity Index (CAI) and equivalent quartz content are widely used parameters for such an assessment, in order to estimate and predict drillability and associated wear of drill bits, cutting discs or chisels. In this article, the correlations between strength, abrasivity and mineral content of various rock types are investigated. The concept of hardness in geotechnics and engineering geology is elaborated in greater detail, shedding light on hardness definitions, testing methods and how hardness parameters are interrelated. Under the aspect that the CAI shows a good correlation with the Mohs hardness commonly used in mineralogy, a novel approach for estimating the CAI is presented. It is suggested that the CAI of a rock can be estimated within 50 % of the actual value, if its UCS exceeds »60 MPa. On the data basis of various rock types analysed from national and international construction projects, the potential and limitations of this method are discussed.

AB - Since ancient times, rocks and their geomechanical and mineralogical properties have played a fundamental role for realising construction and infrastructure projects. Workability and excavability of the material itself are still decisive factors controlling tool wear and advancement rates. In engineering geology, standardised tests and analyses related to the strength, hardness, abrasivity and mineralogical composition are commonly conducted in this context. The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), CERCHAR Abrasivity Index (CAI) and equivalent quartz content are widely used parameters for such an assessment, in order to estimate and predict drillability and associated wear of drill bits, cutting discs or chisels. In this article, the correlations between strength, abrasivity and mineral content of various rock types are investigated. The concept of hardness in geotechnics and engineering geology is elaborated in greater detail, shedding light on hardness definitions, testing methods and how hardness parameters are interrelated. Under the aspect that the CAI shows a good correlation with the Mohs hardness commonly used in mineralogy, a novel approach for estimating the CAI is presented. It is suggested that the CAI of a rock can be estimated within 50 % of the actual value, if its UCS exceeds »60 MPa. On the data basis of various rock types analysed from national and international construction projects, the potential and limitations of this method are discussed.

KW - rock strength

KW - rock hardness

KW - rock mechanics

KW - engineering geology

KW - Felsmechanik

KW - Ingenieurgeologie

U2 - 10.1002/geot.202200007

DO - 10.1002/geot.202200007

M3 - Article

VL - 16.2023

SP - 184

EP - 192

JO - Geomechanics and tunnelling = Geomechanik und Tunnelbau

JF - Geomechanics and tunnelling = Geomechanik und Tunnelbau

SN - 1865-7362

IS - 2

ER -