Deep learning approaches for classification of copper-containing metal scrap in recycling processes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Deep learning approaches for classification of copper-containing metal scrap in recycling processes. / Koinig, Gerald; Kuhn, Nikolai Emanuel; Fink, Thomas et al.
In: Waste management, Vol. 190.2024, No. 15 December, 24.10.2024, p. 520-530.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Vancouver

Koinig G, Kuhn NE, Fink T, Lorber B, Radmann Y, Martinelli W et al. Deep learning approaches for classification of copper-containing metal scrap in recycling processes. Waste management. 2024 Oct 24;190.2024(15 December):520-530. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2024.10.022

Bibtex - Download

@article{e17d0ee4dc0040ae8692bf627b4689eb,
title = "Deep learning approaches for classification of copper-containing metal scrap in recycling processes",
abstract = "Separating copper from iron scrap is a critical operation in metal recycling and achieving this with low cost sensoric equipment like RGB cameras instead of XRF/XRT is becoming increasingly attractive. In this article, the groundwork for creating an image classification model to separate copper from iron scrap has been performed. Twenty of the most common and most easily available CNN architectures were trained on 2200 metal scrap specimens and evaluated inline on a sensor-based sorting rig for their prediction accuracy and their inference latency to mimic real circumstances in an industrial setting. Out of these evaluated architectures, DenseNet-201 with 98% accuracy in inline tests is recommended if potent hardware is available. Otherwise AlexNet with 92% accuracy or MobileNet-V2 with 90% accuracy are recommended for further investigation and model creation if hardware restrictions apply. Based on the presented results in this article, the initial cumbersome surveyance of the most suitable network architecture can be substantially reduced and the creation of a sorting model can be streamlined. This article thus provides the basis for creating an inline applicable sorting method for scrap metal that uses low cost sensorics equipment and can provide reasonably high accuracy in its prediction.",
keywords = "Circular economy, Computer vision, Deep learning, Machine learning, Metal recycling, Sensor based sorting",
author = "Gerald Koinig and Kuhn, {Nikolai Emanuel} and Thomas Fink and Bojan Lorber and Y. Radmann and Walter Martinelli and Alexia Tischberger-Aldrian",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s)",
year = "2024",
month = oct,
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/j.wasman.2024.10.022",
language = "English",
volume = "190.2024",
pages = "520--530",
journal = "Waste management",
issn = "0956-053X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "15 December",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deep learning approaches for classification of copper-containing metal scrap in recycling processes

AU - Koinig, Gerald

AU - Kuhn, Nikolai Emanuel

AU - Fink, Thomas

AU - Lorber, Bojan

AU - Radmann, Y.

AU - Martinelli, Walter

AU - Tischberger-Aldrian, Alexia

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)

PY - 2024/10/24

Y1 - 2024/10/24

N2 - Separating copper from iron scrap is a critical operation in metal recycling and achieving this with low cost sensoric equipment like RGB cameras instead of XRF/XRT is becoming increasingly attractive. In this article, the groundwork for creating an image classification model to separate copper from iron scrap has been performed. Twenty of the most common and most easily available CNN architectures were trained on 2200 metal scrap specimens and evaluated inline on a sensor-based sorting rig for their prediction accuracy and their inference latency to mimic real circumstances in an industrial setting. Out of these evaluated architectures, DenseNet-201 with 98% accuracy in inline tests is recommended if potent hardware is available. Otherwise AlexNet with 92% accuracy or MobileNet-V2 with 90% accuracy are recommended for further investigation and model creation if hardware restrictions apply. Based on the presented results in this article, the initial cumbersome surveyance of the most suitable network architecture can be substantially reduced and the creation of a sorting model can be streamlined. This article thus provides the basis for creating an inline applicable sorting method for scrap metal that uses low cost sensorics equipment and can provide reasonably high accuracy in its prediction.

AB - Separating copper from iron scrap is a critical operation in metal recycling and achieving this with low cost sensoric equipment like RGB cameras instead of XRF/XRT is becoming increasingly attractive. In this article, the groundwork for creating an image classification model to separate copper from iron scrap has been performed. Twenty of the most common and most easily available CNN architectures were trained on 2200 metal scrap specimens and evaluated inline on a sensor-based sorting rig for their prediction accuracy and their inference latency to mimic real circumstances in an industrial setting. Out of these evaluated architectures, DenseNet-201 with 98% accuracy in inline tests is recommended if potent hardware is available. Otherwise AlexNet with 92% accuracy or MobileNet-V2 with 90% accuracy are recommended for further investigation and model creation if hardware restrictions apply. Based on the presented results in this article, the initial cumbersome surveyance of the most suitable network architecture can be substantially reduced and the creation of a sorting model can be streamlined. This article thus provides the basis for creating an inline applicable sorting method for scrap metal that uses low cost sensorics equipment and can provide reasonably high accuracy in its prediction.

KW - Circular economy

KW - Computer vision

KW - Deep learning

KW - Machine learning

KW - Metal recycling

KW - Sensor based sorting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207014633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wasman.2024.10.022

DO - 10.1016/j.wasman.2024.10.022

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85207014633

VL - 190.2024

SP - 520

EP - 530

JO - Waste management

JF - Waste management

SN - 0956-053X

IS - 15 December

ER -