Additive Manufacturing of Steel and Copper Using Fused Layer Modelling: Material and Process Development

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Additive Manufacturing of Steel and Copper Using Fused Layer Modelling: Material and Process Development. / Ecker, J. V.; Dobrezberger, K.; Gonzalez-Gutierrez, J. et al.
In: Powder metallurgy progress, Vol. 19.2019, No. 2, 15.06.2020, p. 63-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Vancouver

Ecker JV, Dobrezberger K, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Spoerk M, Gierl-Mayer C, Danninger H. Additive Manufacturing of Steel and Copper Using Fused Layer Modelling: Material and Process Development. Powder metallurgy progress. 2020 Jun 15;19.2019(2):63-81. Epub 2020 Jun 15. doi: 10.1515/pmp-2019-0007

Bibtex - Download

@article{c867fd11ab57424187a6a8d2917a2420,
title = "Additive Manufacturing of Steel and Copper Using Fused Layer Modelling: Material and Process Development",
abstract = "Fused Layer Modelling (FLM) is one out of several material extrusion (ME) additive manufacturing (AM) methods. FLM usually deals with processing of polymeric materials but can also be used to process metal-filled polymeric systems to produce metallic parts. Using FLM for this purpose helps to save costs since the FLM hardware is cheap compared to e.g. direct metal laser processing hardware, and FLM offers an alternative route to the production of metallic components. To produce metallic parts by FLM, the methodology is different from direct metal processing technologies, and several processing steps are required: First, filaments consisting of a special polymer-metal composition are produced. The filament is then transformed into shaped parts by using FLM process technology. Subsequently the polymeric binder is removed (”debinding”) and finally the metallic powder body is sintered. Depending on the metal powder used, the binder composition, the FLM production parameters and also the debinding and sintering processes must be carefully adapted and optimized. The focal points of this study are as following: 1. To confirm that metallic parts can be produced by using FLM plus debinding and sintering as an alternative route to direct metal additive manufacturing. 2. Determination of process parameters, depending on the used metal powders (steel and copper) and optimization of each process step. 3. Comparison of the production paths for the different metal powders and their debinding and sintering behavior as well as the final properties of the produced parts. The results showed that both materials were printable after adjusting the FLM parameters, metallic parts being produced for both metal powder systems. The production method and the sintering process worked out well for both powders. However there are specific challenges in the sintering process that have to be overcome to produce high quality metal parts. This study serves as a fundamental basis for understanding when it comes to the processing of steel and copper powder into metallic parts using FLM processing technology. ",
keywords = "316L stainless steel powder, additive manufacturing, Cu powder, mcrostructure, properties, Fused Filament Fabrication, highly filled polymer",
author = "Ecker, {J. V.} and K. Dobrezberger and J. Gonzalez-Gutierrez and M. Spoerk and Ch Gierl-Mayer and H. Danninger",
year = "2020",
month = jun,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1515/pmp-2019-0007",
language = "English",
volume = "19.2019",
pages = "63--81",
journal = "Powder metallurgy progress",
issn = "1335-8987",
publisher = "De Gruyter Open Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Additive Manufacturing of Steel and Copper Using Fused Layer Modelling

T2 - Material and Process Development

AU - Ecker, J. V.

AU - Dobrezberger, K.

AU - Gonzalez-Gutierrez, J.

AU - Spoerk, M.

AU - Gierl-Mayer, Ch

AU - Danninger, H.

PY - 2020/6/15

Y1 - 2020/6/15

N2 - Fused Layer Modelling (FLM) is one out of several material extrusion (ME) additive manufacturing (AM) methods. FLM usually deals with processing of polymeric materials but can also be used to process metal-filled polymeric systems to produce metallic parts. Using FLM for this purpose helps to save costs since the FLM hardware is cheap compared to e.g. direct metal laser processing hardware, and FLM offers an alternative route to the production of metallic components. To produce metallic parts by FLM, the methodology is different from direct metal processing technologies, and several processing steps are required: First, filaments consisting of a special polymer-metal composition are produced. The filament is then transformed into shaped parts by using FLM process technology. Subsequently the polymeric binder is removed (”debinding”) and finally the metallic powder body is sintered. Depending on the metal powder used, the binder composition, the FLM production parameters and also the debinding and sintering processes must be carefully adapted and optimized. The focal points of this study are as following: 1. To confirm that metallic parts can be produced by using FLM plus debinding and sintering as an alternative route to direct metal additive manufacturing. 2. Determination of process parameters, depending on the used metal powders (steel and copper) and optimization of each process step. 3. Comparison of the production paths for the different metal powders and their debinding and sintering behavior as well as the final properties of the produced parts. The results showed that both materials were printable after adjusting the FLM parameters, metallic parts being produced for both metal powder systems. The production method and the sintering process worked out well for both powders. However there are specific challenges in the sintering process that have to be overcome to produce high quality metal parts. This study serves as a fundamental basis for understanding when it comes to the processing of steel and copper powder into metallic parts using FLM processing technology.

AB - Fused Layer Modelling (FLM) is one out of several material extrusion (ME) additive manufacturing (AM) methods. FLM usually deals with processing of polymeric materials but can also be used to process metal-filled polymeric systems to produce metallic parts. Using FLM for this purpose helps to save costs since the FLM hardware is cheap compared to e.g. direct metal laser processing hardware, and FLM offers an alternative route to the production of metallic components. To produce metallic parts by FLM, the methodology is different from direct metal processing technologies, and several processing steps are required: First, filaments consisting of a special polymer-metal composition are produced. The filament is then transformed into shaped parts by using FLM process technology. Subsequently the polymeric binder is removed (”debinding”) and finally the metallic powder body is sintered. Depending on the metal powder used, the binder composition, the FLM production parameters and also the debinding and sintering processes must be carefully adapted and optimized. The focal points of this study are as following: 1. To confirm that metallic parts can be produced by using FLM plus debinding and sintering as an alternative route to direct metal additive manufacturing. 2. Determination of process parameters, depending on the used metal powders (steel and copper) and optimization of each process step. 3. Comparison of the production paths for the different metal powders and their debinding and sintering behavior as well as the final properties of the produced parts. The results showed that both materials were printable after adjusting the FLM parameters, metallic parts being produced for both metal powder systems. The production method and the sintering process worked out well for both powders. However there are specific challenges in the sintering process that have to be overcome to produce high quality metal parts. This study serves as a fundamental basis for understanding when it comes to the processing of steel and copper powder into metallic parts using FLM processing technology.

KW - 316L stainless steel powder

KW - additive manufacturing

KW - Cu powder

KW - mcrostructure

KW - properties

KW - Fused Filament Fabrication

KW - highly filled polymer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087422010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/pmp-2019-0007

DO - 10.1515/pmp-2019-0007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85087422010

VL - 19.2019

SP - 63

EP - 81

JO - Powder metallurgy progress

JF - Powder metallurgy progress

SN - 1335-8987

IS - 2

ER -