Seismic fragility and risk assessment of an unsupported tunnel using incremental dynamic analysis (IDA)

Publikationen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung(peer-reviewed)

Standard

Seismic fragility and risk assessment of an unsupported tunnel using incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). / Moayedi Far, Arsham; Nejati, Hamid Reza ; Goshtasbi , Kamran et al.
in: Earthquakes and Structures, Jahrgang 16.2019, Nr. 6, 25.06.2019, S. 705-714.

Publikationen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung(peer-reviewed)

Vancouver

Moayedi Far A, Nejati HR, Goshtasbi K, Khosrotash M. Seismic fragility and risk assessment of an unsupported tunnel using incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). Earthquakes and Structures. 2019 Jun 25;16.2019(6):705-714. doi: 10.12989/EAS.2019.16.6.705

Author

Moayedi Far, Arsham ; Nejati, Hamid Reza ; Goshtasbi , Kamran et al. / Seismic fragility and risk assessment of an unsupported tunnel using incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). in: Earthquakes and Structures. 2019 ; Jahrgang 16.2019, Nr. 6. S. 705-714.

Bibtex - Download

@article{0d0d9ef3f58c480d97fde614ac857e99,
title = "Seismic fragility and risk assessment of an unsupported tunnel using incremental dynamic analysis (IDA)",
abstract = "Seismic assessment of underground structures is one of the challenging problems in engineering design. This is because there are usually many sources of uncertainties in rocks and probable earthquake characteristics. Therefore, for decreasing of the uncertainties, seismic response of underground structures should be evaluated by sufficient number of earthquake records which is scarcely possible in common seismic assessment of underground structures. In the present study, a practical risk-based approach was performed for seismic risk assessment of an unsupported tunnel. For this purpose, Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) was used to evaluate the seismic response of a tunnel in south-west railway of Iran and different analyses were conducted using 15 real records of earthquakes which were chosen from the PEER ground motion database. All of the selected records were scaled to different intensity levels (PGA=0.1-1.7 g) and applied to the numerical models. Based on the numerical modeling results, seismic fragility curves of the tunnel under study were derived from the IDA curves. In the next, seismic risk curve of the tunnel were determined by convolving the hazard and fragility curves. On the basis of the tunnel fragility curves, an earthquake with PGA equal to 0.35 g may lead to severe damage or collapse of the tunnel with only 3% probability and the probability of moderate damage to the tunnel is 12%. ",
author = "{Moayedi Far}, Arsham and Nejati, {Hamid Reza} and Kamran Goshtasbi and Mohammad Khosrotash",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
day = "25",
doi = "10.12989/EAS.2019.16.6.705",
language = "English",
volume = "16.2019",
pages = "705--714",
journal = "Earthquakes and Structures",
issn = "2092-7622",
number = "6",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seismic fragility and risk assessment of an unsupported tunnel using incremental dynamic analysis (IDA)

AU - Moayedi Far, Arsham

AU - Nejati, Hamid Reza

AU - Goshtasbi , Kamran

AU - Khosrotash, Mohammad

PY - 2019/6/25

Y1 - 2019/6/25

N2 - Seismic assessment of underground structures is one of the challenging problems in engineering design. This is because there are usually many sources of uncertainties in rocks and probable earthquake characteristics. Therefore, for decreasing of the uncertainties, seismic response of underground structures should be evaluated by sufficient number of earthquake records which is scarcely possible in common seismic assessment of underground structures. In the present study, a practical risk-based approach was performed for seismic risk assessment of an unsupported tunnel. For this purpose, Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) was used to evaluate the seismic response of a tunnel in south-west railway of Iran and different analyses were conducted using 15 real records of earthquakes which were chosen from the PEER ground motion database. All of the selected records were scaled to different intensity levels (PGA=0.1-1.7 g) and applied to the numerical models. Based on the numerical modeling results, seismic fragility curves of the tunnel under study were derived from the IDA curves. In the next, seismic risk curve of the tunnel were determined by convolving the hazard and fragility curves. On the basis of the tunnel fragility curves, an earthquake with PGA equal to 0.35 g may lead to severe damage or collapse of the tunnel with only 3% probability and the probability of moderate damage to the tunnel is 12%.

AB - Seismic assessment of underground structures is one of the challenging problems in engineering design. This is because there are usually many sources of uncertainties in rocks and probable earthquake characteristics. Therefore, for decreasing of the uncertainties, seismic response of underground structures should be evaluated by sufficient number of earthquake records which is scarcely possible in common seismic assessment of underground structures. In the present study, a practical risk-based approach was performed for seismic risk assessment of an unsupported tunnel. For this purpose, Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) was used to evaluate the seismic response of a tunnel in south-west railway of Iran and different analyses were conducted using 15 real records of earthquakes which were chosen from the PEER ground motion database. All of the selected records were scaled to different intensity levels (PGA=0.1-1.7 g) and applied to the numerical models. Based on the numerical modeling results, seismic fragility curves of the tunnel under study were derived from the IDA curves. In the next, seismic risk curve of the tunnel were determined by convolving the hazard and fragility curves. On the basis of the tunnel fragility curves, an earthquake with PGA equal to 0.35 g may lead to severe damage or collapse of the tunnel with only 3% probability and the probability of moderate damage to the tunnel is 12%.

UR - https://doi.org/10.12989/EAS.2019.16.6.705

U2 - 10.12989/EAS.2019.16.6.705

DO - 10.12989/EAS.2019.16.6.705

M3 - Article

VL - 16.2019

SP - 705

EP - 714

JO - Earthquakes and Structures

JF - Earthquakes and Structures

SN - 2092-7622

IS - 6

ER -