Responsible sourcing for energy transitions: Discussing academic narratives of responsible sourcing through the lens of natural resource justice

Publikationen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung(peer-reviewed)

Standard

Responsible sourcing for energy transitions: Discussing academic narratives of responsible sourcing through the lens of natural resource justice. / Kügerl, Marie-Theres; Hitch, Michael; Gugerell, Katharina.
in: Journal of environmental management, Jahrgang 326.2023, Nr. Part B, 15 January, 116711, 21.11.2022.

Publikationen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung(peer-reviewed)

Bibtex - Download

@article{efe3f0ee712e4ff9930b47b4c78b7b95,
title = "Responsible sourcing for energy transitions: Discussing academic narratives of responsible sourcing through the lens of natural resource justice",
abstract = "The Paris Agreement and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals clearly demonstrate the need for global energy transitions. Evolving energy generation and the expansion of the renewable energy capacity and associated infrastructure contribute to changing and increasing demands for minerals and metals. The potential negative environmental, social and economic impacts of increased mineral resource production have been contested and are under increasing scrutiny by both academia and civil society. Responsible Sourcing (RS) has become a management approach for companies and policymakers to identify, monitor and address potential negative impacts along their raw materials{\textquoteright} supply chains. Although RS might contribute to sustainability along the supply chain, this paper raises the question of whether it also contributes to Natural Resource Justice (NRJ) in energy transitions. Based on a bibliometric network analysis, this study investigated current narratives of RS literature and to what degree core aspects of NRJ (e.g., distribution of benefits and burdens, power asymmetries, property rights) are reflected in the RS debate following a deductive approach. The results obtained show that compared with other sectors (e.g., timber, food, biomass, textiles) debates on RS in renewable energy-related sectors are still scarce and fragmented. The analysis indicates that different foci are aligned with one or more of the traditional three sustainability dimensions (i.e., environmental, social, economic), while few addressed aspects of NRJ. The authors observed a distinct lack of holistic justice considerations in the current RS debate and only a few individual issues are discussed, such as the detection of burden shifting, accountability for supplier behavior, and sharing of financial benefits. This research contributes to the understanding of different RS approaches and extends the RS discussion to NRJ considerations in energy transitions. It also points out important paths for future research to contribute to just energy transitions.",
keywords = "Verantwortungsvolle Beschaffung, Ressourcengerechtigkeit, Ressourcenmanagement, Mineralische Rohstoffe, Erneuerbare Energie, Energiewende, responsible sourcing, natural resource justice, resource governance, mineral resources, renewable energy, energy transition",
author = "Marie-Theres K{\"u}gerl and Michael Hitch and Katharina Gugerell",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116711",
language = "English",
volume = "326.2023",
journal = "Journal of environmental management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "Part B, 15 January",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responsible sourcing for energy transitions

T2 - Discussing academic narratives of responsible sourcing through the lens of natural resource justice

AU - Kügerl, Marie-Theres

AU - Hitch, Michael

AU - Gugerell, Katharina

PY - 2022/11/21

Y1 - 2022/11/21

N2 - The Paris Agreement and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals clearly demonstrate the need for global energy transitions. Evolving energy generation and the expansion of the renewable energy capacity and associated infrastructure contribute to changing and increasing demands for minerals and metals. The potential negative environmental, social and economic impacts of increased mineral resource production have been contested and are under increasing scrutiny by both academia and civil society. Responsible Sourcing (RS) has become a management approach for companies and policymakers to identify, monitor and address potential negative impacts along their raw materials’ supply chains. Although RS might contribute to sustainability along the supply chain, this paper raises the question of whether it also contributes to Natural Resource Justice (NRJ) in energy transitions. Based on a bibliometric network analysis, this study investigated current narratives of RS literature and to what degree core aspects of NRJ (e.g., distribution of benefits and burdens, power asymmetries, property rights) are reflected in the RS debate following a deductive approach. The results obtained show that compared with other sectors (e.g., timber, food, biomass, textiles) debates on RS in renewable energy-related sectors are still scarce and fragmented. The analysis indicates that different foci are aligned with one or more of the traditional three sustainability dimensions (i.e., environmental, social, economic), while few addressed aspects of NRJ. The authors observed a distinct lack of holistic justice considerations in the current RS debate and only a few individual issues are discussed, such as the detection of burden shifting, accountability for supplier behavior, and sharing of financial benefits. This research contributes to the understanding of different RS approaches and extends the RS discussion to NRJ considerations in energy transitions. It also points out important paths for future research to contribute to just energy transitions.

AB - The Paris Agreement and the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals clearly demonstrate the need for global energy transitions. Evolving energy generation and the expansion of the renewable energy capacity and associated infrastructure contribute to changing and increasing demands for minerals and metals. The potential negative environmental, social and economic impacts of increased mineral resource production have been contested and are under increasing scrutiny by both academia and civil society. Responsible Sourcing (RS) has become a management approach for companies and policymakers to identify, monitor and address potential negative impacts along their raw materials’ supply chains. Although RS might contribute to sustainability along the supply chain, this paper raises the question of whether it also contributes to Natural Resource Justice (NRJ) in energy transitions. Based on a bibliometric network analysis, this study investigated current narratives of RS literature and to what degree core aspects of NRJ (e.g., distribution of benefits and burdens, power asymmetries, property rights) are reflected in the RS debate following a deductive approach. The results obtained show that compared with other sectors (e.g., timber, food, biomass, textiles) debates on RS in renewable energy-related sectors are still scarce and fragmented. The analysis indicates that different foci are aligned with one or more of the traditional three sustainability dimensions (i.e., environmental, social, economic), while few addressed aspects of NRJ. The authors observed a distinct lack of holistic justice considerations in the current RS debate and only a few individual issues are discussed, such as the detection of burden shifting, accountability for supplier behavior, and sharing of financial benefits. This research contributes to the understanding of different RS approaches and extends the RS discussion to NRJ considerations in energy transitions. It also points out important paths for future research to contribute to just energy transitions.

KW - Verantwortungsvolle Beschaffung

KW - Ressourcengerechtigkeit

KW - Ressourcenmanagement

KW - Mineralische Rohstoffe

KW - Erneuerbare Energie

KW - Energiewende

KW - responsible sourcing

KW - natural resource justice

KW - resource governance

KW - mineral resources

KW - renewable energy

KW - energy transition

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116711

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116711

M3 - Article

VL - 326.2023

JO - Journal of environmental management

JF - Journal of environmental management

SN - 0301-4797

IS - Part B, 15 January

M1 - 116711

ER -