Representative-Elementary-Volume Analysis of Two-Phase Flow in Layered Rocks

Publikationen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung(peer-reviewed)

Standard

Representative-Elementary-Volume Analysis of Two-Phase Flow in Layered Rocks. / Sedaghat, Mohammadhossein; Azizmohammadi, Siroos.
in: SPE reservoir evaluation & [and] engineering, Jahrgang 22, Nr. 3, 08.2019, S. 1075-1083.

Publikationen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung(peer-reviewed)

Bibtex - Download

@article{1acfbca7513a44bdbbc8c3a743776fc9,
title = "Representative-Elementary-Volume Analysis of Two-Phase Flow in Layered Rocks",
abstract = " Geological/flow properties computed from a heterogeneous rock sample represent the properties of the entire medium if the size of the sample is larger than the size of the representative elementary volume (REV) of the rock. Among these properties, relative permeability is believed to have the most influence on multiphase-flow behavior. Therefore, much care must be taken to ensure that relative permeability has been computed beyond the REV size. However, in the literature, experimental and numerical evaluations of relative permeability are mostly performed without such care, and the saturation functions are calculated at different flow rates while the length of the sample remains the same.In this work, a series of numerical simulations of waterflooding are performed in a model made of alternating parallel layers of two rock types. Upscaled relative permeabilities are computed on samples at different lengths, changing from millimeter to kilometer scale. Flow behavior for different samples is analyzed according to capillary, viscous, and gravity effects, which are monitored during the simulation.Although the REV size for some properties such as porosity seems to be the smallest replica block (unit block), our results show that the REV for relative permeability follows a power-law trend and changes with flow rate and scale. More importantly, for the first time, it is shown that the REV size is not necessarily identical for different phases. It is also demonstrated that especially at small scales, breakthrough can occur at layers where it was not expected. This study identifies the range of the length scale for which either experimental or numerical determination of relative permeability is valid.",
keywords = "Representative Elementary Volume (REV), Layered Rocks, Two-phase flow, Upscaling, Waterflooding",
author = "Mohammadhossein Sedaghat and Siroos Azizmohammadi",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
doi = "10.2118/194014-PA",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "1075--1083",
journal = "SPE reservoir evaluation & [and] engineering",
issn = "1094-6470",
publisher = "Society of Petroleum Engineers ",
number = "3",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Representative-Elementary-Volume Analysis of Two-Phase Flow in Layered Rocks

AU - Sedaghat, Mohammadhossein

AU - Azizmohammadi, Siroos

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - Geological/flow properties computed from a heterogeneous rock sample represent the properties of the entire medium if the size of the sample is larger than the size of the representative elementary volume (REV) of the rock. Among these properties, relative permeability is believed to have the most influence on multiphase-flow behavior. Therefore, much care must be taken to ensure that relative permeability has been computed beyond the REV size. However, in the literature, experimental and numerical evaluations of relative permeability are mostly performed without such care, and the saturation functions are calculated at different flow rates while the length of the sample remains the same.In this work, a series of numerical simulations of waterflooding are performed in a model made of alternating parallel layers of two rock types. Upscaled relative permeabilities are computed on samples at different lengths, changing from millimeter to kilometer scale. Flow behavior for different samples is analyzed according to capillary, viscous, and gravity effects, which are monitored during the simulation.Although the REV size for some properties such as porosity seems to be the smallest replica block (unit block), our results show that the REV for relative permeability follows a power-law trend and changes with flow rate and scale. More importantly, for the first time, it is shown that the REV size is not necessarily identical for different phases. It is also demonstrated that especially at small scales, breakthrough can occur at layers where it was not expected. This study identifies the range of the length scale for which either experimental or numerical determination of relative permeability is valid.

AB - Geological/flow properties computed from a heterogeneous rock sample represent the properties of the entire medium if the size of the sample is larger than the size of the representative elementary volume (REV) of the rock. Among these properties, relative permeability is believed to have the most influence on multiphase-flow behavior. Therefore, much care must be taken to ensure that relative permeability has been computed beyond the REV size. However, in the literature, experimental and numerical evaluations of relative permeability are mostly performed without such care, and the saturation functions are calculated at different flow rates while the length of the sample remains the same.In this work, a series of numerical simulations of waterflooding are performed in a model made of alternating parallel layers of two rock types. Upscaled relative permeabilities are computed on samples at different lengths, changing from millimeter to kilometer scale. Flow behavior for different samples is analyzed according to capillary, viscous, and gravity effects, which are monitored during the simulation.Although the REV size for some properties such as porosity seems to be the smallest replica block (unit block), our results show that the REV for relative permeability follows a power-law trend and changes with flow rate and scale. More importantly, for the first time, it is shown that the REV size is not necessarily identical for different phases. It is also demonstrated that especially at small scales, breakthrough can occur at layers where it was not expected. This study identifies the range of the length scale for which either experimental or numerical determination of relative permeability is valid.

KW - Representative Elementary Volume (REV)

KW - Layered Rocks

KW - Two-phase flow

KW - Upscaling

KW - Waterflooding

U2 - 10.2118/194014-PA

DO - 10.2118/194014-PA

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 1075

EP - 1083

JO - SPE reservoir evaluation & [and] engineering

JF - SPE reservoir evaluation & [and] engineering

SN - 1094-6470

IS - 3

ER -