Medical robotics simulation framework for application-specific optimal kinematics

Publikationen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung(peer-reviewed)

Standard

Medical robotics simulation framework for application-specific optimal kinematics. / Böttger, Sven; Çallar, Tolga Can; Schweikard, Achim et al.
in: Current directions in biomedical engineering, Jahrgang 5.2019, Nr. 1, 18.09.2019, S. 145-148.

Publikationen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung(peer-reviewed)

Vancouver

Böttger S, Çallar TC, Schweikard A, Rückert E. Medical robotics simulation framework for application-specific optimal kinematics. Current directions in biomedical engineering. 2019 Sep 18;5.2019(1):145-148. doi: 10.1515/cdbme-2019-0037

Author

Böttger, Sven ; Çallar, Tolga Can ; Schweikard, Achim et al. / Medical robotics simulation framework for application-specific optimal kinematics. in: Current directions in biomedical engineering. 2019 ; Jahrgang 5.2019, Nr. 1. S. 145-148.

Bibtex - Download

@article{9adf290d16a64f8289c74d2df6186492,
title = "Medical robotics simulation framework for application-specific optimal kinematics",
abstract = "Most kinematic structures in robot architectures for medical tasks are not optimal. Further, the workspace and payloads are often oversized which results in high product prices that are not suitable for a clinical technology transfer. To investigate optimal kinematic structures and configurations, we have developed an adaptive simulation framework with an associated workflow for requirement analyses, modelling and simulation of specific robot kinematics. The framework is used to build simple and cost effective medical robot designs and was evaluated in a tool manipulation task where medical instruments had to be positioned precisely and oriented on the patient's body. The model quality is measured based on the maximum workspace coverage according to a configurable scoring metric. The metric generalizes among different human body shapes that are based on anthropometric data from UMTRI Human Shape. This dexterity measure is used to analyze different kinematic structures in simulations using the open source simulation tool V-REP. Therefor we developed simulation and visualization procedures for medical tasks based on a patchwork of size-variant anatomical target regions that can be configured and selectively activated in a motion planning controller. In our evaluations we compared the dexterity scores of a commercial lightweight robot arm with 7 joints to optimized kinematic structures with 6, 7 and 8 joints. Compared to the commercial hardware, we achieved improvements of 59% when using an optimized 6-dimensional robot arm, 64% with the 7-dimensional arm and 96% with an 8-dimensional robot arm. Our results show that simpler robot designs can outperform the typically used commercial robot arms in medical applications where the maximum workspace coverage is essential. Our framework provides the basis for a fully automatic optimization tool of the robot parameters that can be applied to a large variety of problems.",
keywords = "anthropometric body shape data, medical robotics, optimization, robot kinematics",
author = "Sven B{\"o}ttger and {\c C}allar, {Tolga Can} and Achim Schweikard and Elmar R{\"u}ckert",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston.",
year = "2019",
month = sep,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1515/cdbme-2019-0037",
language = "English",
volume = "5.2019",
pages = "145--148",
journal = " Current directions in biomedical engineering",
issn = "2364-5504",
publisher = "de Gruyter",
number = "1",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical robotics simulation framework for application-specific optimal kinematics

AU - Böttger, Sven

AU - Çallar, Tolga Can

AU - Schweikard, Achim

AU - Rückert, Elmar

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston.

PY - 2019/9/18

Y1 - 2019/9/18

N2 - Most kinematic structures in robot architectures for medical tasks are not optimal. Further, the workspace and payloads are often oversized which results in high product prices that are not suitable for a clinical technology transfer. To investigate optimal kinematic structures and configurations, we have developed an adaptive simulation framework with an associated workflow for requirement analyses, modelling and simulation of specific robot kinematics. The framework is used to build simple and cost effective medical robot designs and was evaluated in a tool manipulation task where medical instruments had to be positioned precisely and oriented on the patient's body. The model quality is measured based on the maximum workspace coverage according to a configurable scoring metric. The metric generalizes among different human body shapes that are based on anthropometric data from UMTRI Human Shape. This dexterity measure is used to analyze different kinematic structures in simulations using the open source simulation tool V-REP. Therefor we developed simulation and visualization procedures for medical tasks based on a patchwork of size-variant anatomical target regions that can be configured and selectively activated in a motion planning controller. In our evaluations we compared the dexterity scores of a commercial lightweight robot arm with 7 joints to optimized kinematic structures with 6, 7 and 8 joints. Compared to the commercial hardware, we achieved improvements of 59% when using an optimized 6-dimensional robot arm, 64% with the 7-dimensional arm and 96% with an 8-dimensional robot arm. Our results show that simpler robot designs can outperform the typically used commercial robot arms in medical applications where the maximum workspace coverage is essential. Our framework provides the basis for a fully automatic optimization tool of the robot parameters that can be applied to a large variety of problems.

AB - Most kinematic structures in robot architectures for medical tasks are not optimal. Further, the workspace and payloads are often oversized which results in high product prices that are not suitable for a clinical technology transfer. To investigate optimal kinematic structures and configurations, we have developed an adaptive simulation framework with an associated workflow for requirement analyses, modelling and simulation of specific robot kinematics. The framework is used to build simple and cost effective medical robot designs and was evaluated in a tool manipulation task where medical instruments had to be positioned precisely and oriented on the patient's body. The model quality is measured based on the maximum workspace coverage according to a configurable scoring metric. The metric generalizes among different human body shapes that are based on anthropometric data from UMTRI Human Shape. This dexterity measure is used to analyze different kinematic structures in simulations using the open source simulation tool V-REP. Therefor we developed simulation and visualization procedures for medical tasks based on a patchwork of size-variant anatomical target regions that can be configured and selectively activated in a motion planning controller. In our evaluations we compared the dexterity scores of a commercial lightweight robot arm with 7 joints to optimized kinematic structures with 6, 7 and 8 joints. Compared to the commercial hardware, we achieved improvements of 59% when using an optimized 6-dimensional robot arm, 64% with the 7-dimensional arm and 96% with an 8-dimensional robot arm. Our results show that simpler robot designs can outperform the typically used commercial robot arms in medical applications where the maximum workspace coverage is essential. Our framework provides the basis for a fully automatic optimization tool of the robot parameters that can be applied to a large variety of problems.

KW - anthropometric body shape data

KW - medical robotics

KW - optimization

KW - robot kinematics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072643567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/cdbme-2019-0037

DO - 10.1515/cdbme-2019-0037

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072643567

VL - 5.2019

SP - 145

EP - 148

JO - Current directions in biomedical engineering

JF - Current directions in biomedical engineering

SN - 2364-5504

IS - 1

ER -