Dynamic Load Evaluation of Large Dimensioned Casing Strings at Primary Cementing
Publikationen: Thesis / Studienabschlussarbeiten und Habilitationsschriften › Masterarbeit
Standard
2007.
Publikationen: Thesis / Studienabschlussarbeiten und Habilitationsschriften › Masterarbeit
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex - Download
}
RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download
TY - THES
T1 - Dynamic Load Evaluation of Large Dimensioned Casing Strings at Primary Cementing
AU - Jedlitschka, Volker
N1 - no embargo
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - In this thesis a plug cementation of a 16" casing string is investigated. What happened was that during primary cementing of a 16" casing string at a depth of 2440 m, the string failed. It was assumed that the bottom plug plugged the float valve and thus the cement column was immediately stopped on its way downhole (water hammer phenomenon). Task was to investigated if this water hammer effect causes a suffiecent high load to damage the casing string. It could be figured out that the string faced a maximum load of 61,53 bar but out of this only 11,3 bar were generated by the water hammer. The remaining 50,3 bar were caused due to the hydrostatc difference between the annulus and the casing. Further it could be proved that larger casing sizes do not increase the impact of a water hammer. Concerning pipe dimensions the ratio between wall thickness and inner diameter is decisive. The whole study is supported with a simulation software called Wanda 3.
AB - In this thesis a plug cementation of a 16" casing string is investigated. What happened was that during primary cementing of a 16" casing string at a depth of 2440 m, the string failed. It was assumed that the bottom plug plugged the float valve and thus the cement column was immediately stopped on its way downhole (water hammer phenomenon). Task was to investigated if this water hammer effect causes a suffiecent high load to damage the casing string. It could be figured out that the string faced a maximum load of 61,53 bar but out of this only 11,3 bar were generated by the water hammer. The remaining 50,3 bar were caused due to the hydrostatc difference between the annulus and the casing. Further it could be proved that larger casing sizes do not increase the impact of a water hammer. Concerning pipe dimensions the ratio between wall thickness and inner diameter is decisive. The whole study is supported with a simulation software called Wanda 3.
KW - Wasserschlag
KW - Plug Zementation
KW - Float Collar
KW - Plug
KW - Joukowsky
KW - Budau
KW - Free Falling Cement
KW - E-modul
KW - Druckwelle
KW - Schallgeschwindigkeit
KW - Reflexionszeit
KW - Opicem
KW - Wanda
KW - Fluent
KW - water hammer
KW - plug cementation
KW - float collar
KW - plug
KW - joukowsky
KW - budau
KW - free falling cement
KW - elastic liquid column
KW - bulk modulus
KW - pressure wave
KW - transients
KW - pressure puls
KW - cavitation pressure
KW - speed of sound
KW - reflection time
KW - opicem
KW - wanda
KW - fluent
M3 - Master's Thesis
ER -