A Sequential Inverse Heat Conduction Problem in OpenFOAM

Publikationen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung(peer-reviewed)

Standard

A Sequential Inverse Heat Conduction Problem in OpenFOAM. / Bohacek, Jan; Kominek, J; Vakhrushev, Alexander et al.
in: Open Foam Journal, Jahrgang 1.2021, Nr. 1, 2022, S. 27-46.

Publikationen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung(peer-reviewed)

Vancouver

Bohacek J, Kominek J, Vakhrushev A, Karimi Sibaki E, Lee TW. A Sequential Inverse Heat Conduction Problem in OpenFOAM. Open Foam Journal. 2022;1.2021(1):27-46. Epub 2021 Okt 21. doi: 10.51560/ofj.v1.33

Author

Bohacek, Jan ; Kominek, J ; Vakhrushev, Alexander et al. / A Sequential Inverse Heat Conduction Problem in OpenFOAM. in: Open Foam Journal. 2022 ; Jahrgang 1.2021, Nr. 1. S. 27-46.

Bibtex - Download

@article{44c9cbf9d19448c6a621f5ada7784415,
title = "A Sequential Inverse Heat Conduction Problem in OpenFOAM",
abstract = "The solution of the inverse heat conduction problem (IHCP) is commonly found with thesequential algorithm known as the function specification method with explicit updating formulas andsensitivity coefficients of heat flux. This paper presents a different approach namely a direct mathemat-ical optimization of minimizing the least squares norm between experimental data and simulation. ACFD open-source code OpenFOAM is used together with NLOPT and DLIB optimization libraries. Toguarantee credibility of the simulation tool developed herein, real experimental data is used from spraycooling of a fast-moving hot steel plate. As the IHCP is inherently an ill-posed problem, the proposedsequential algorithm is stabilized using future time stepping and thereof the optimal number is explained.An assumption about the profile of thermal boundary condition during future steps must be made. Itis shown that assuming a linear change of the heat transfer coefficient during each sequence of futuretime steps yields more accurate results than setting a constant value. For the problem size consideredwith less than 10k cells, the preconditioned conjugate gradient (FDIC) linear solver converges fasterthan the multigrid solver (GAMG). However, the latter performs better as the accuracy is concerned.Concerning the best choice of minimizer, the BOBYQA algorithm (quadratic approximation) is foundsuperior to other methods. The proposed IHCP solver is compared with the well-established one.The solution of the inverse heat conduction problem (IHCP) is commonly found with thesequential algorithm known as the function specification method with explicit updating formulas andsensitivity coefficients of heat flux. This paper presents a different approach namely a direct mathemat-ical optimization of minimizing the least squares norm between experimental data and simulation. ACFD open-source code OpenFOAM is used together with NLOPT and DLIB optimization libraries. Toguarantee credibility of the simulation tool developed herein, real experimental data is used from spraycooling of a fast-moving hot steel plate. As the IHCP is inherently an ill-posed problem, the proposedsequential algorithm is stabilized using future time stepping and thereof the optimal number is explained.An assumption about the profile of thermal boundary condition during future steps must be made. Itis shown that assuming a linear change of the heat transfer coefficient during each sequence of futuretime steps yields more accurate results than setting a constant value. For the problem size consideredwith less than 10k cells, the preconditioned conjugate gradient (FDIC) linear solver converges fasterthan the multigrid solver (GAMG). However, the latter performs better as the accuracy is concerned.Concerning the best choice of minimizer, the BOBYQA algorithm (quadratic approximation) is foundsuperior to other methods. The proposed IHCP solver is compared with the well-established one.",
author = "Jan Bohacek and J Kominek and Alexander Vakhrushev and {Karimi Sibaki}, Ebrahim and T.W. Lee",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.51560/ofj.v1.33",
language = "English",
volume = "1.2021",
pages = "27--46",
journal = "Open Foam Journal",
number = "1",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Sequential Inverse Heat Conduction Problem in OpenFOAM

AU - Bohacek, Jan

AU - Kominek, J

AU - Vakhrushev, Alexander

AU - Karimi Sibaki, Ebrahim

AU - Lee, T.W.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - The solution of the inverse heat conduction problem (IHCP) is commonly found with thesequential algorithm known as the function specification method with explicit updating formulas andsensitivity coefficients of heat flux. This paper presents a different approach namely a direct mathemat-ical optimization of minimizing the least squares norm between experimental data and simulation. ACFD open-source code OpenFOAM is used together with NLOPT and DLIB optimization libraries. Toguarantee credibility of the simulation tool developed herein, real experimental data is used from spraycooling of a fast-moving hot steel plate. As the IHCP is inherently an ill-posed problem, the proposedsequential algorithm is stabilized using future time stepping and thereof the optimal number is explained.An assumption about the profile of thermal boundary condition during future steps must be made. Itis shown that assuming a linear change of the heat transfer coefficient during each sequence of futuretime steps yields more accurate results than setting a constant value. For the problem size consideredwith less than 10k cells, the preconditioned conjugate gradient (FDIC) linear solver converges fasterthan the multigrid solver (GAMG). However, the latter performs better as the accuracy is concerned.Concerning the best choice of minimizer, the BOBYQA algorithm (quadratic approximation) is foundsuperior to other methods. The proposed IHCP solver is compared with the well-established one.The solution of the inverse heat conduction problem (IHCP) is commonly found with thesequential algorithm known as the function specification method with explicit updating formulas andsensitivity coefficients of heat flux. This paper presents a different approach namely a direct mathemat-ical optimization of minimizing the least squares norm between experimental data and simulation. ACFD open-source code OpenFOAM is used together with NLOPT and DLIB optimization libraries. Toguarantee credibility of the simulation tool developed herein, real experimental data is used from spraycooling of a fast-moving hot steel plate. As the IHCP is inherently an ill-posed problem, the proposedsequential algorithm is stabilized using future time stepping and thereof the optimal number is explained.An assumption about the profile of thermal boundary condition during future steps must be made. Itis shown that assuming a linear change of the heat transfer coefficient during each sequence of futuretime steps yields more accurate results than setting a constant value. For the problem size consideredwith less than 10k cells, the preconditioned conjugate gradient (FDIC) linear solver converges fasterthan the multigrid solver (GAMG). However, the latter performs better as the accuracy is concerned.Concerning the best choice of minimizer, the BOBYQA algorithm (quadratic approximation) is foundsuperior to other methods. The proposed IHCP solver is compared with the well-established one.

AB - The solution of the inverse heat conduction problem (IHCP) is commonly found with thesequential algorithm known as the function specification method with explicit updating formulas andsensitivity coefficients of heat flux. This paper presents a different approach namely a direct mathemat-ical optimization of minimizing the least squares norm between experimental data and simulation. ACFD open-source code OpenFOAM is used together with NLOPT and DLIB optimization libraries. Toguarantee credibility of the simulation tool developed herein, real experimental data is used from spraycooling of a fast-moving hot steel plate. As the IHCP is inherently an ill-posed problem, the proposedsequential algorithm is stabilized using future time stepping and thereof the optimal number is explained.An assumption about the profile of thermal boundary condition during future steps must be made. Itis shown that assuming a linear change of the heat transfer coefficient during each sequence of futuretime steps yields more accurate results than setting a constant value. For the problem size consideredwith less than 10k cells, the preconditioned conjugate gradient (FDIC) linear solver converges fasterthan the multigrid solver (GAMG). However, the latter performs better as the accuracy is concerned.Concerning the best choice of minimizer, the BOBYQA algorithm (quadratic approximation) is foundsuperior to other methods. The proposed IHCP solver is compared with the well-established one.The solution of the inverse heat conduction problem (IHCP) is commonly found with thesequential algorithm known as the function specification method with explicit updating formulas andsensitivity coefficients of heat flux. This paper presents a different approach namely a direct mathemat-ical optimization of minimizing the least squares norm between experimental data and simulation. ACFD open-source code OpenFOAM is used together with NLOPT and DLIB optimization libraries. Toguarantee credibility of the simulation tool developed herein, real experimental data is used from spraycooling of a fast-moving hot steel plate. As the IHCP is inherently an ill-posed problem, the proposedsequential algorithm is stabilized using future time stepping and thereof the optimal number is explained.An assumption about the profile of thermal boundary condition during future steps must be made. Itis shown that assuming a linear change of the heat transfer coefficient during each sequence of futuretime steps yields more accurate results than setting a constant value. For the problem size consideredwith less than 10k cells, the preconditioned conjugate gradient (FDIC) linear solver converges fasterthan the multigrid solver (GAMG). However, the latter performs better as the accuracy is concerned.Concerning the best choice of minimizer, the BOBYQA algorithm (quadratic approximation) is foundsuperior to other methods. The proposed IHCP solver is compared with the well-established one.

U2 - 10.51560/ofj.v1.33

DO - 10.51560/ofj.v1.33

M3 - Article

VL - 1.2021

SP - 27

EP - 46

JO - Open Foam Journal

JF - Open Foam Journal

IS - 1

ER -