Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations: Why delta is not parts per thousand and why we should not use epsilon and mu notations
Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review
Standard
In: Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, Vol. 43.2019, No. 4, 01.12.2019, p. 527-528.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex - Download
}
RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download
TY - JOUR
T1 - Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations
T2 - Why delta is not parts per thousand and why we should not use epsilon and mu notations
AU - Meisel, Thomas C.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075200261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ggr.12303
DO - 10.1111/ggr.12303
M3 - Editorial
AN - SCOPUS:85075200261
VL - 43.2019
SP - 527
EP - 528
JO - Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
JF - Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
SN - 1639-4488
IS - 4
ER -