Metal impact and vaporization on the Moon’s surface: nano-geochemical insights into the source of lunar metals

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Metal impact and vaporization on the Moon’s surface: nano-geochemical insights into the source of lunar metals. / Gopon, Phillip; Douglas, James; Gardner, Hazel et al.
In: Meteoritics and planetary science, Vol. 59.2024, No. 7, 07.2024, p. 1775-1789.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Vancouver

Gopon P, Douglas J, Gardner H, Moody M, Wood B, Halliday A et al. Metal impact and vaporization on the Moon’s surface: nano-geochemical insights into the source of lunar metals. Meteoritics and planetary science. 2024 Jul;59.2024(7):1775-1789. doi: 10.1111/maps.14184

Bibtex - Download

@article{7aa7f6c361204da8bd395f00f72beb3a,
title = "Metal impact and vaporization on the Moon{\textquoteright}s surface: nano-geochemical insights into the source of lunar metals",
abstract = "Millimeter-to-nanometer-sized iron- and nickel-rich metals are ubiquitous on the lunar surface. The proposed origin of these metals falls into two broad classes which should have distinct geochemical signatures—(1) the reduction of iron-bearing minerals or (2) the addition of metals from meteoritic sources. The metals measured here from the Apollo 16 regolith possess low Ni (2–6 wt%) and elevated Ge (80–350 ppm) suggesting a meteoritic origin. However, the measured Ni is lower, and the Ge higher than currently known iron meteorites. In comparison to the low Ni iron meteorites, the even lower Ni and higher Ge contents exhibited by these lunar metals are best explained by impact-driven volatilization and condensation of Ni-poor meteoritic metal during their impact and addition to the lunar surface. The presence of similar, low Ni-bearing metals in Apollo return samples from geographically distant sites suggests that this geochemical signature might not be restricted to just the Apollo 16 locality and that volatility-driven modification of meteoritic metals are a common feature of lunar regolith formation. The possibility of a significant low Ni/high Ge meteoritic component in the lunar regolith, and the observation of chemical fractionation during emplacement, has implications for the interpretation of both lunar remote-sensing data and bulk geochemical data derived from sample return material. Additionally, our observation of predominantly meteoritic sourced metals has implications for the prevalence of meteoritic addition on airless planetary bodies.",
author = "Phillip Gopon and James Douglas and Hazel Gardner and Michael Moody and Bernard Wood and Alexander Halliday and Jon Wade",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors. Meteoritics & Planetary Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Meteoritical Society.",
year = "2024",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1111/maps.14184",
language = "English",
volume = "59.2024",
pages = "1775--1789",
journal = "Meteoritics and planetary science",
issn = "1086-9379",
publisher = "The University of Arkansas Press",
number = "7",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metal impact and vaporization on the Moon’s surface

T2 - nano-geochemical insights into the source of lunar metals

AU - Gopon, Phillip

AU - Douglas, James

AU - Gardner, Hazel

AU - Moody, Michael

AU - Wood, Bernard

AU - Halliday, Alexander

AU - Wade, Jon

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors. Meteoritics & Planetary Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Meteoritical Society.

PY - 2024/7

Y1 - 2024/7

N2 - Millimeter-to-nanometer-sized iron- and nickel-rich metals are ubiquitous on the lunar surface. The proposed origin of these metals falls into two broad classes which should have distinct geochemical signatures—(1) the reduction of iron-bearing minerals or (2) the addition of metals from meteoritic sources. The metals measured here from the Apollo 16 regolith possess low Ni (2–6 wt%) and elevated Ge (80–350 ppm) suggesting a meteoritic origin. However, the measured Ni is lower, and the Ge higher than currently known iron meteorites. In comparison to the low Ni iron meteorites, the even lower Ni and higher Ge contents exhibited by these lunar metals are best explained by impact-driven volatilization and condensation of Ni-poor meteoritic metal during their impact and addition to the lunar surface. The presence of similar, low Ni-bearing metals in Apollo return samples from geographically distant sites suggests that this geochemical signature might not be restricted to just the Apollo 16 locality and that volatility-driven modification of meteoritic metals are a common feature of lunar regolith formation. The possibility of a significant low Ni/high Ge meteoritic component in the lunar regolith, and the observation of chemical fractionation during emplacement, has implications for the interpretation of both lunar remote-sensing data and bulk geochemical data derived from sample return material. Additionally, our observation of predominantly meteoritic sourced metals has implications for the prevalence of meteoritic addition on airless planetary bodies.

AB - Millimeter-to-nanometer-sized iron- and nickel-rich metals are ubiquitous on the lunar surface. The proposed origin of these metals falls into two broad classes which should have distinct geochemical signatures—(1) the reduction of iron-bearing minerals or (2) the addition of metals from meteoritic sources. The metals measured here from the Apollo 16 regolith possess low Ni (2–6 wt%) and elevated Ge (80–350 ppm) suggesting a meteoritic origin. However, the measured Ni is lower, and the Ge higher than currently known iron meteorites. In comparison to the low Ni iron meteorites, the even lower Ni and higher Ge contents exhibited by these lunar metals are best explained by impact-driven volatilization and condensation of Ni-poor meteoritic metal during their impact and addition to the lunar surface. The presence of similar, low Ni-bearing metals in Apollo return samples from geographically distant sites suggests that this geochemical signature might not be restricted to just the Apollo 16 locality and that volatility-driven modification of meteoritic metals are a common feature of lunar regolith formation. The possibility of a significant low Ni/high Ge meteoritic component in the lunar regolith, and the observation of chemical fractionation during emplacement, has implications for the interpretation of both lunar remote-sensing data and bulk geochemical data derived from sample return material. Additionally, our observation of predominantly meteoritic sourced metals has implications for the prevalence of meteoritic addition on airless planetary bodies.

UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/maps.14184

U2 - 10.1111/maps.14184

DO - 10.1111/maps.14184

M3 - Article

VL - 59.2024

SP - 1775

EP - 1789

JO - Meteoritics and planetary science

JF - Meteoritics and planetary science

SN - 1086-9379

IS - 7

ER -