Case study: Comparison of enhanced heavy-oil recovery by CGI, WAG, and GAGD
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, Vol. 38.2016, No. 15, 02.08.2016, p. 2181-2189.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex - Download
}
RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download
TY - JOUR
T1 - Case study
T2 - Comparison of enhanced heavy-oil recovery by CGI, WAG, and GAGD
AU - Tavousi, Zohreh
AU - Kharrat, Riyaz
AU - Hashemi, Abdolnabi
AU - Ghoodjani, Eshragh
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2016/8/2
Y1 - 2016/8/2
KW - CGI
KW - CO
KW - enhanced oil recovery (EOR)
KW - GAGD
KW - heavy oil
KW - hydrocarbon gas (HC-gas)
KW - WAG
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981748242&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15567036.2014.997903
DO - 10.1080/15567036.2014.997903
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84981748242
VL - 38.2016
SP - 2181
EP - 2189
JO - Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects
JF - Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects
SN - 1556-7036
IS - 15
ER -
