The high demand for carbon-based products within pyrometallurgy is placing the industry
in an increasingly challenging position to meet stringent requirements. To transition away from fossil
carbon carriers, biochar emerges as a sustainable and CO2-neutral alternative, presenting a viable
solution without necessitating fundamental adjustments to plant technology, unlike hydrogen as an
alternative reducing agent. Prior investigations have underscored the potential of woody biomass
pyrolysis products for CO2-neutral metallurgy. Nonetheless, it is imperative to recognize that
biochar must meet distinct requirements across various metallurgical processes. This paper conducts
a comparative analysis between biochar and petroleum coke using thermogravimetric analyses,
surface measurements, reactivity assessments, and scanning electron microscopy. Furthermore, the
performance in a furnace for simulating the Waelz process, specifically regarding ZnO reduction,
is scrutinized. The results illustrate the optical differences between petroleum coke and biochar
and the significantly higher reactivity and specific surface area of biochar. When used in solid–gas
reactors, it is observed that due to its high reactivity, biochar reacts more vigorously and carbon
is completely consumed. However, during the reduction of ZnO, only minor differences were
monitored, making biochar comparable to petroleum coke. Therefore, under certain constraints,
biochar can be considered a potential substitute for metallurgical solid–gas reactions.