The state of environmental sustainability considerations in mining

Publikationen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung(peer-reviewed)

Standard

The state of environmental sustainability considerations in mining. / Tost, Michael; Hitch, Michael; Chandurkar, Vighnesh et al.
in: Journal of Cleaner Production, Jahrgang 2018, Nr. 182, 07.02.2018, S. 969.

Publikationen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung(peer-reviewed)

Vancouver

Tost M, Hitch M, Chandurkar V, Moser P, Feiel S. The state of environmental sustainability considerations in mining. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018 Feb 7;2018(182):969. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.051

Author

Tost, Michael ; Hitch, Michael ; Chandurkar, Vighnesh et al. / The state of environmental sustainability considerations in mining. in: Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018 ; Jahrgang 2018, Nr. 182. S. 969.

Bibtex - Download

@article{636886f73b6e49a58d7a2de293864910,
title = "The state of environmental sustainability considerations in mining",
abstract = "In the Global Mining Initiative, the mining industry came together to understand the industry's role inthe transition to sustainable development and to ensure its long-term contribution. The industry hassince then come a long way and improved its sustainable development performance in many areas. Buthow far has the industry been considering environmental (“strong”) sustainability in its approach? Andhow does this compare to companies in other sectors and leading organizations such as the UnitedNations, World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the Global Reporting Initiative?This paper presents results from a literature review, looking at how far the mining industry hasconsidered environmental sustainability in its approach. It explores, if the current efforts of the largestmining companies are aligned with the efforts of companies from other industry sectors, as well as theposition of leading organizations.We conclude that the mining industry is not setting on the wrong sustainability paradigm at this stage,but is at risk of falling behind societal expectations on climate change and the leaders from other industrieson natural capital considerations. The industry can improve by considering the Paris Agreementin its approach to climate change, considering natural capital as an industry, e.g. through working withthe Natural Capital Coalition and more broadly by pro-actively thinking about what the consequences of“strong sustainability” would mean for their business models.",
keywords = "Mining Weak and strong sustainability Planetary boundaries Natural capital SDGs",
author = "Michael Tost and Michael Hitch and Vighnesh Chandurkar and Peter Moser and Susanne Feiel",
year = "2018",
month = feb,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.051",
language = "English",
volume = "2018",
pages = "969",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "182",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The state of environmental sustainability considerations in mining

AU - Tost, Michael

AU - Hitch, Michael

AU - Chandurkar, Vighnesh

AU - Moser, Peter

AU - Feiel, Susanne

PY - 2018/2/7

Y1 - 2018/2/7

N2 - In the Global Mining Initiative, the mining industry came together to understand the industry's role inthe transition to sustainable development and to ensure its long-term contribution. The industry hassince then come a long way and improved its sustainable development performance in many areas. Buthow far has the industry been considering environmental (“strong”) sustainability in its approach? Andhow does this compare to companies in other sectors and leading organizations such as the UnitedNations, World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the Global Reporting Initiative?This paper presents results from a literature review, looking at how far the mining industry hasconsidered environmental sustainability in its approach. It explores, if the current efforts of the largestmining companies are aligned with the efforts of companies from other industry sectors, as well as theposition of leading organizations.We conclude that the mining industry is not setting on the wrong sustainability paradigm at this stage,but is at risk of falling behind societal expectations on climate change and the leaders from other industrieson natural capital considerations. The industry can improve by considering the Paris Agreementin its approach to climate change, considering natural capital as an industry, e.g. through working withthe Natural Capital Coalition and more broadly by pro-actively thinking about what the consequences of“strong sustainability” would mean for their business models.

AB - In the Global Mining Initiative, the mining industry came together to understand the industry's role inthe transition to sustainable development and to ensure its long-term contribution. The industry hassince then come a long way and improved its sustainable development performance in many areas. Buthow far has the industry been considering environmental (“strong”) sustainability in its approach? Andhow does this compare to companies in other sectors and leading organizations such as the UnitedNations, World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the Global Reporting Initiative?This paper presents results from a literature review, looking at how far the mining industry hasconsidered environmental sustainability in its approach. It explores, if the current efforts of the largestmining companies are aligned with the efforts of companies from other industry sectors, as well as theposition of leading organizations.We conclude that the mining industry is not setting on the wrong sustainability paradigm at this stage,but is at risk of falling behind societal expectations on climate change and the leaders from other industrieson natural capital considerations. The industry can improve by considering the Paris Agreementin its approach to climate change, considering natural capital as an industry, e.g. through working withthe Natural Capital Coalition and more broadly by pro-actively thinking about what the consequences of“strong sustainability” would mean for their business models.

KW - Mining Weak and strong sustainability Planetary boundaries Natural capital SDGs

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.051

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.051

M3 - Article

VL - 2018

SP - 969

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

IS - 182

ER -