The state of environmental sustainability considerations in mining
Publikationen: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › (peer-reviewed)
Standard
in: Journal of Cleaner Production, Jahrgang 2018, Nr. 182, 07.02.2018, S. 969.
Publikationen: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › (peer-reviewed)
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex - Download
}
RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download
TY - JOUR
T1 - The state of environmental sustainability considerations in mining
AU - Tost, Michael
AU - Hitch, Michael
AU - Chandurkar, Vighnesh
AU - Moser, Peter
AU - Feiel, Susanne
PY - 2018/2/7
Y1 - 2018/2/7
N2 - In the Global Mining Initiative, the mining industry came together to understand the industry's role inthe transition to sustainable development and to ensure its long-term contribution. The industry hassince then come a long way and improved its sustainable development performance in many areas. Buthow far has the industry been considering environmental (“strong”) sustainability in its approach? Andhow does this compare to companies in other sectors and leading organizations such as the UnitedNations, World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the Global Reporting Initiative?This paper presents results from a literature review, looking at how far the mining industry hasconsidered environmental sustainability in its approach. It explores, if the current efforts of the largestmining companies are aligned with the efforts of companies from other industry sectors, as well as theposition of leading organizations.We conclude that the mining industry is not setting on the wrong sustainability paradigm at this stage,but is at risk of falling behind societal expectations on climate change and the leaders from other industrieson natural capital considerations. The industry can improve by considering the Paris Agreementin its approach to climate change, considering natural capital as an industry, e.g. through working withthe Natural Capital Coalition and more broadly by pro-actively thinking about what the consequences of“strong sustainability” would mean for their business models.
AB - In the Global Mining Initiative, the mining industry came together to understand the industry's role inthe transition to sustainable development and to ensure its long-term contribution. The industry hassince then come a long way and improved its sustainable development performance in many areas. Buthow far has the industry been considering environmental (“strong”) sustainability in its approach? Andhow does this compare to companies in other sectors and leading organizations such as the UnitedNations, World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the Global Reporting Initiative?This paper presents results from a literature review, looking at how far the mining industry hasconsidered environmental sustainability in its approach. It explores, if the current efforts of the largestmining companies are aligned with the efforts of companies from other industry sectors, as well as theposition of leading organizations.We conclude that the mining industry is not setting on the wrong sustainability paradigm at this stage,but is at risk of falling behind societal expectations on climate change and the leaders from other industrieson natural capital considerations. The industry can improve by considering the Paris Agreementin its approach to climate change, considering natural capital as an industry, e.g. through working withthe Natural Capital Coalition and more broadly by pro-actively thinking about what the consequences of“strong sustainability” would mean for their business models.
KW - Mining Weak and strong sustainability Planetary boundaries Natural capital SDGs
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.051
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.051
M3 - Article
VL - 2018
SP - 969
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
SN - 0959-6526
IS - 182
ER -