The Marbles of Roman Portraits - New Data on the Marble Provenance of 261 Imperial and Private Urban Portraits Dating from the mid 1st century B.C. to the early 6th century A.D.

Publikationen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung(peer-reviewed)

Standard

The Marbles of Roman Portraits - New Data on the Marble Provenance of 261 Imperial and Private Urban Portraits Dating from the mid 1st century B.C. to the early 6th century A.D. / Attanasio, Donato; Bruno, Mathias; Prochaska, Walter.
in: Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Jahrgang 2019, Nr. 134, 2019, S. 167-277.

Publikationen: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung(peer-reviewed)

Bibtex - Download

@article{f624e5b528514532b2f392c8b744ac10,
title = "The Marbles of Roman Portraits - New Data on the Marble Provenance of 261 Imperial and Private Urban Portraits Dating from the mid 1st century B.C. to the early 6th century A.D.",
abstract = "Abstract: Donato Attanasio – Matthias Bruno – Walter Prochaska, The Marbles of Roman Portraits. New Data on the Marble Provenance of 261 Imperial and Private Urban Portraits Dating from the Mid 1st Century B.C. to the Early 6th Century A.D. The marble provenance of 261 Roman portraits (167 imperial, 94 private) mostly of urban production and dating from the mid 1st century B.C. to the early 6th century A.D. has been established. The results show that G{\"o}ktepe, not far from Aphrodisias, was the most widely used variety (44.3 %, imperial portraits) followed by Parian lychnites (28.7 %), whereas other marbles such as Luna or Docimium played a limited role. G{\"o}ktepe started to be used at Rome in Trajanʼs times and rapidly spread out, becoming dominant under Hadrian. Subsequently, the trend did not change. G{\"o}ktepe was the most prized sculptural marble in Antonine times, reached its apogee under the Severans and continued to be the marble of choice during the 3rd century and in late antiquity. Correspondingly, Parian lychnites, dominant till the mid 1st century A.D., underwent a strong decrease and almost disappeared from the late 2nd centu- ry onwards. Also the importance of Luna marbles appears to be much lower than previously thought. The role played by Aphrodisian artists is considered to be crucial for explaining the success of the marble of G{\"o}ktepe. The consequences of this close sculptor-marble relationship on the artistic trends that were popular at Rome in imperial times are briefly discussed. Keywords: Roman Portraits – Marble Provenance – Diachronic Data – G{\"o}ktepe Marble – Lychnites Marble – Aphrodisian Sculptors – Isotopes – Trace Analysis – EPR",
keywords = "Marmorherkunft Kaiserportraits",
author = "Donato Attanasio and Mathias Bruno and Walter Prochaska",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
volume = "2019",
pages = "167--277",
journal = "Jahrbuch des Deutschen Arch{\"a}ologischen Instituts",
issn = "0070-4415",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "134",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Marbles of Roman Portraits - New Data on the Marble Provenance of 261 Imperial and Private Urban Portraits Dating from the mid 1st century B.C. to the early 6th century A.D.

AU - Attanasio, Donato

AU - Bruno, Mathias

AU - Prochaska, Walter

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Abstract: Donato Attanasio – Matthias Bruno – Walter Prochaska, The Marbles of Roman Portraits. New Data on the Marble Provenance of 261 Imperial and Private Urban Portraits Dating from the Mid 1st Century B.C. to the Early 6th Century A.D. The marble provenance of 261 Roman portraits (167 imperial, 94 private) mostly of urban production and dating from the mid 1st century B.C. to the early 6th century A.D. has been established. The results show that Göktepe, not far from Aphrodisias, was the most widely used variety (44.3 %, imperial portraits) followed by Parian lychnites (28.7 %), whereas other marbles such as Luna or Docimium played a limited role. Göktepe started to be used at Rome in Trajanʼs times and rapidly spread out, becoming dominant under Hadrian. Subsequently, the trend did not change. Göktepe was the most prized sculptural marble in Antonine times, reached its apogee under the Severans and continued to be the marble of choice during the 3rd century and in late antiquity. Correspondingly, Parian lychnites, dominant till the mid 1st century A.D., underwent a strong decrease and almost disappeared from the late 2nd centu- ry onwards. Also the importance of Luna marbles appears to be much lower than previously thought. The role played by Aphrodisian artists is considered to be crucial for explaining the success of the marble of Göktepe. The consequences of this close sculptor-marble relationship on the artistic trends that were popular at Rome in imperial times are briefly discussed. Keywords: Roman Portraits – Marble Provenance – Diachronic Data – Göktepe Marble – Lychnites Marble – Aphrodisian Sculptors – Isotopes – Trace Analysis – EPR

AB - Abstract: Donato Attanasio – Matthias Bruno – Walter Prochaska, The Marbles of Roman Portraits. New Data on the Marble Provenance of 261 Imperial and Private Urban Portraits Dating from the Mid 1st Century B.C. to the Early 6th Century A.D. The marble provenance of 261 Roman portraits (167 imperial, 94 private) mostly of urban production and dating from the mid 1st century B.C. to the early 6th century A.D. has been established. The results show that Göktepe, not far from Aphrodisias, was the most widely used variety (44.3 %, imperial portraits) followed by Parian lychnites (28.7 %), whereas other marbles such as Luna or Docimium played a limited role. Göktepe started to be used at Rome in Trajanʼs times and rapidly spread out, becoming dominant under Hadrian. Subsequently, the trend did not change. Göktepe was the most prized sculptural marble in Antonine times, reached its apogee under the Severans and continued to be the marble of choice during the 3rd century and in late antiquity. Correspondingly, Parian lychnites, dominant till the mid 1st century A.D., underwent a strong decrease and almost disappeared from the late 2nd centu- ry onwards. Also the importance of Luna marbles appears to be much lower than previously thought. The role played by Aphrodisian artists is considered to be crucial for explaining the success of the marble of Göktepe. The consequences of this close sculptor-marble relationship on the artistic trends that were popular at Rome in imperial times are briefly discussed. Keywords: Roman Portraits – Marble Provenance – Diachronic Data – Göktepe Marble – Lychnites Marble – Aphrodisian Sculptors – Isotopes – Trace Analysis – EPR

KW - Marmorherkunft Kaiserportraits

M3 - Article

VL - 2019

SP - 167

EP - 277

JO - Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts

JF - Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts

SN - 0070-4415

IS - 134

ER -