Comparison of chemical, physical and optical methods to distinguish between magnetite and hematite: Case study Kiirunavaara deposit, Sweden

Publikationen: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/KonferenzbandBeitrag in Konferenzband

Standard

Comparison of chemical, physical and optical methods to distinguish between magnetite and hematite: Case study Kiirunavaara deposit, Sweden. / Böhm, Andreas; Wartbichler, Manuel; Niiranen, Karl.
Preprints to Conference in Minerals Engineering, Lulea 2014. 2014. S. 181-190.

Publikationen: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/KonferenzbandBeitrag in Konferenzband

Bibtex - Download

@inproceedings{091c24df663b44c9abaee2655f78ec3c,
title = "Comparison of chemical, physical and optical methods to distinguish between magnetite and hematite: Case study Kiirunavaara deposit, Sweden",
author = "Andreas B{\"o}hm and Manuel Wartbichler and Karl Niiranen",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
pages = "181--190",
booktitle = "Preprints to Conference in Minerals Engineering, Lulea 2014",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of chemical, physical and optical methods to distinguish between magnetite and hematite: Case study Kiirunavaara deposit, Sweden

AU - Böhm, Andreas

AU - Wartbichler, Manuel

AU - Niiranen, Karl

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 181

EP - 190

BT - Preprints to Conference in Minerals Engineering, Lulea 2014

ER -