2D versus 3D Liberation Analysis to Characterize InItergrowth in LD Slags
Publikationen: Konferenzbeitrag › Vortrag › Forschung › (peer-reviewed)
Standard
2D versus 3D Liberation Analysis to Characterize InItergrowth in LD Slags. / Böhm, Andreas.
2016. XXVIII International Mineral Processing Congress (IMPC) 2016, Quebec, Kanada.
2016. XXVIII International Mineral Processing Congress (IMPC) 2016, Quebec, Kanada.
Publikationen: Konferenzbeitrag › Vortrag › Forschung › (peer-reviewed)
Harvard
Böhm, A 2016, '2D versus 3D Liberation Analysis to Characterize InItergrowth in LD Slags', XXVIII International Mineral Processing Congress (IMPC) 2016, Quebec, Kanada, 11/09/16 - 15/09/16.
APA
Böhm, A. (2016). 2D versus 3D Liberation Analysis to Characterize InItergrowth in LD Slags. XXVIII International Mineral Processing Congress (IMPC) 2016, Quebec, Kanada.
Vancouver
Böhm A. 2D versus 3D Liberation Analysis to Characterize InItergrowth in LD Slags. 2016. XXVIII International Mineral Processing Congress (IMPC) 2016, Quebec, Kanada.
Author
Bibtex - Download
@conference{2a385bd9f629431b9727f8b2223f1556,
title = "2D versus 3D Liberation Analysis to Characterize InItergrowth in LD Slags",
author = "Andreas B{\"o}hm",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
note = "XXVIII International Mineral Processing Congress (IMPC) 2016 ; Conference date: 11-09-2016 Through 15-09-2016",
}
RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download
TY - CONF
T1 - 2D versus 3D Liberation Analysis to Characterize InItergrowth in LD Slags
AU - Böhm, Andreas
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
M3 - Presentation
T2 - XXVIII International Mineral Processing Congress (IMPC) 2016
Y2 - 11 September 2016 through 15 September 2016
ER -
